ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2022
The Evaluation of Cardiovascular Surgery-Associated Google Search Trends During COVID-19 Waves.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the study was to clarify public interest about cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic using Google Trends (GT). Methods: The study was performed between November 20 and December 1, 2021. A total of 21 keywords related to cardiovascular surgery were selected. Public attention to all selected keywords was analyzed by GT with using the filters "web search," "all categories," and "Turkey." In Turkey, three COVID-19 waves (between March 12, 2020, and May 8, 2020, November 24, 2020, and January 20, 2021, and March 20, 2021, and May 16, 2021) were experienced since the beginning of the pandemic. To analyze public attention to cardiovascular surgery during the COVID-19 waves, 8-week periods during the COVID-19 waves were compared with the same times in the past 4 years (2016-2019). Results: Comparisons of March 12-May 8 2020 and the same period between 2016 and 2019 showed that total public interest about cardiovascular surgery was significantly decreased (-28.7%, p=0.001). The comparison of the second COVID-19 wave (November 24, 2020-January 20, 2021 versus November 24-January 20, 2016-2019) revealed that public interest about cardiovascular surgery was significantly lower in the COVID-19 era (-22.2%, p=0.001). Comparison of the third COVID-19 wave and the same periods in the previous 4 years demonstrated that public interest about cardiovascular disease was significantly lower in the COVID-19 era (-8.5%, p=0.001). In contrast, the term coronary angiography was searched significantly more during the third wave of COVID-19 in comparison to the same periods between 2016 and 2019 (17.9%, p=0.015). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that public interest in cardiovascular diseases was significantly decreased in all waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, interest in only the term coronary angiography was significantly increased in the third wave of pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.