Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304214›Full record

ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2022

Relationship Among

Ferhat Bacaksiz, Omer Ozturk, Ilyas Tenlik, Berat Ebik, Derya Ari, Volkan Gokbulut, Ozlem Akdogan, Yasemin Ozderin Ozin, Zeki Mesut Yalin Kilic, Ertugrul Kayacetin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ferhat BacaksizDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Research and Training Hospital, Diyarbakır, Türkiye.
Omer OzturkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ilyas TenlikDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Berat EbikDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Research and Training Hospital, Diyarbakır, Türkiye.
Derya AriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Volkan GokbulutDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ozlem AkdoganDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Yasemin Ozderin OzinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Zeki Mesut Yalin KilicDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ertugrul KayacetinDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Research and Training Hospital, Diyarbakır, Türkiye.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship among lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP), Methods: The retrospective study included patients with isolated hypertensive or hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) who underwent esophageal manometry in our gastroenterology motility laboratory and had normal manometry results. Demographic characteristics, complaints on admission, upper endoscopy findings, 24-h esophageal pH monitoring results, and presence of Hp in gastric biopsy were evaluated. Results: A total of 1226 patients were included in the study, among whom women comprised 54% of all patients. Mean age was 45.4±13.4 years. Most common presenting complaint was pyrosis (85.4%). Pathological reflux was detected in 61.4% of the patients in 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. Reflux esophagitis was detected in 22.9% and LES laxity was present in 17.4% of the patients. In gastric biopsy, Hp was positive in 40% of the patients. The age of patients with hypertensive LES was significantly higher and female gender and body mass index (BMI) were associated with hypertensive LES. Pyrosis was significantly less prevalent in patients with hypertensive LESP. Esophagitis and LES laxity were significantly more prevalent in patients with hypotensive LES. No significant difference was found among the three groups with regard to reflux and Hp positivity. No significant difference was found between Hp-positive and Hp-negative groups with regard to reflux and reflux esophagitis. Conclusion: No clear relationship was found among LES disorders, GER, and Hp. Moreover, no significant difference was found among LES disorders with regard to GER, while the presence of hypotensive LESP, rather than Hp, was found to be an important factor in the development of reflux esophagitis.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal refluxHelicobacter pyloriHypertensive lower esophageal sphincterHypotensive lower esophageal sphincter

Identifiers

PMID36304214
PMCPMC9580963
OpenAlexW4226327943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.