Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36304071›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2022

Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mads Gustaf Jørgensen, Annette Hougaard Chakera, Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich, Jennifer Berg Drejøe, Pia Cajsa Leth Andersen, Hoda Khorasani, Navid Mohamadpour Toyserkani, Jørn Bo Thomsen, Jens Ahm Sørensen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03433937 (Prevention of Seroma Following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection With Prophylactic Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03433937 naterminatednot on this map

Prevention of Seroma Following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection With Prophylactic Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2018 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsSeroma, Surgical Site Infection, Lymphedema, Quality of LifeArmsNegative pressure wound therapy, Micropore tape
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mads Gustaf JørgensenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Research Unit for Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Annette Hougaard ChakeraDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev, Herlev, Denmark.
Lisbet Rosenkrantz HölmichDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev, Herlev, Denmark.
Jennifer Berg DrejøeDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pia Cajsa Leth AndersenDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hoda KhorasaniDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Breast Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Navid Mohamadpour ToyserkaniDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jørn Bo ThomsenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Research Unit for Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jens Ahm SørensenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Research Unit for Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is associated with a high complication rate. Retrospective studies suggest that incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) might reduce complications, especially seroma, following ILND. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-labeled, parallel-group trial. Patients with macrometastic melanoma to the inguinal lymph nodes and eligible for ILND were randomized to receive either iNPWT for 14 postoperative days or conventional wound dressing. The primary outcome was seroma incidence. Secondary outcomes included surgical-site infection, wound rupture, wound necrosis, hematoma, rehospitalization and readmission rates between groups. All outcomes were registered 3 months after ILND and analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: The trial was terminated early due to a low recruitment rate as a consequence of a change in the national treatment protocol, and the estimated sample size was not reached. Twenty patients were included and randomized in the study. The trial showed less seroma formation between the iNPWT 6/11 (55%) and control 7/9 (78%) groups; however, this was not statistically significant ( Conclusion: There was a tendency toward fewer complications in the iNPWT group, however this trial was underpowered and could not confirm the hypothesis that iNPWT reduces complications after ILND. Future randomized controlled trials are required to fully evaluate the treatment potential of iNPWT. Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03433937.

Indexed as

ComplicationsLymph node dissectionMelanomaNegative-pressure wound therapyPICOSeromaVAC

Identifiers

PMID36304071
PMCPMC9593268
OpenAlexW4293217104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.