Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36303993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2021

Integrating Oral PrEP Into Family Planning Services for Women in Sub-saharan Africa: Findings From a Multi-Country Landscape Analysis.

Neeraja Bhavaraju, Rose Wilcher, Regeru Njoroge Regeru, Saiqa Mullick, Imelda Mahaka, Jessica Rodrigues, Jennifer Mason, Jane Schueller, Kristine Torjesen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Neeraja BhavarajuAfton Bloom, Washington, DC, United States.
Rose WilcherGlobal Health, Population and Nutrition, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States.
Regeru Njoroge RegeruLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Saiqa MullickWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Imelda MahakaPangaea Zimbabwe AIDS Trust, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Jessica RodriguesAVAC, New York, NY, United States.
Jennifer MasonOffice of Population and Reproductive Health, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, United States.
Jane SchuellerOffice of HIV/AIDS, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, United States.
Kristine TorjesenGlobal Health, Population and Nutrition, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States.
Family Health International 360 · USAIDS United · USFamily Aids Caring Trust · ZWLVCT Health · KEUnited States Agency for International Development · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integration of HIV and family planning (FP) services is a renewed focus area for national policymakers, donors, and implementers in sub-Saharan Africa as a result of high HIV incidence among general-population women, especially adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), and the perception that integrating HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) into FP services may be an effective way to provide comprehensive HIV and FP services to this population. We conducted a focused desk review to develop a PrEP-FP integration framework across five key categories: plans and policies, resource management, service delivery, PrEP use, and monitoring and reporting. The framework was refined via interviews with 30 stakeholders across seven countries at varying stages of oral PrEP rollout: Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. After refining the framework, we developed a PrEP-FP integration matrix and assessed country-specific progress to identify common enablers of and barriers to PrEP-FP integration. None of the countries included in our analysis had made substantial progress toward integrated PrEP-FP service delivery. Although the countries made progress in one or two categories, integration was often impeded by lack of advancement in other areas. Our framework offers policymakers, program implementers, and health care providers a road map for strategically assessing and monitoring progress toward PrEP-FP integration in their contexts.

Indexed as

AGYWHIV preventionPrEPPrEP-FP integrationSRH-HIV integration

Identifiers

PMID36303993
PMCPMC9580806
OpenAlexW3175354161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.