Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36303908›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Analyzing constraints of smallholders' chickpea (

Asrat Mulat Asegie, Almaz Giziew, Dereje Ayalew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asrat Mulat AsegieCollege of Agriculture, Wollo University, P.O. Box: 1145, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Almaz GiziewCollege of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University, P.O. Box: 5501, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Dereje AyalewCollege of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University, P.O. Box: 5501, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Ethiopian, pulses are the second top most grain crops, of which chickpea takes the first place. However, chickpea production by smallholder farmers has been facing several constraints and this has not been adequately studied using the appropriate techniques. As a result, this study used Henry Garrett's ranking technique to analyze and rank constraints in the production of chickpeas. . Using the multistage sampling technique, the data were gathered from 140 randomly chosen samples. The findings indicate the smallholder chickpea producers face input, marketing, economic, institutional, and environmental constraints. As to the Henry Garrett's ranking, higher price of seed (65%), higher price of chemicals (64.3%), delays in supply of improved seed (64%), capital shortage (60.5%), shortage of improved seed (58%), and disease infestation (56.4%) are the major constraints noted in average values. It is noted that. The study concludes that ranking constraints using the Henry Garrett technique are better as compared to simple frequencies. Key prerequisites for a robust chickpea production include addressing of constraints relating to irregularity and shortage in the supply of improved chickpea seed varieties, higher cost of inputs, diseases and pests, and inability to access in-kind credit.

Indexed as

Diseases and pestsImproved seedInput costsInput supply

Identifiers

PMID36303908
PMCPMC9593202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.