ReviewFrontiers in bioinformatics2021
InterPepRank: Assessment of Docked Peptide Conformations by a Deep Graph Network.
Review in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating AlphaFold Tools and Related Scoring Functions for Protein-peptide Complex Prediction.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2026Article
- PEARL: novel protein targets recommendation model via heterogeneous graph representation learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Peptide-protein docking: from physics-based models to generative intelligence.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- PepScorer::RMSD: An Improved Machine Learning Scoring Function for Protein-Peptide Docking.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A new age in structural S-layer biology: Experimental and in silico milestones.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025Review
- Leveraging machine learning models for peptide-protein interaction prediction.RSC chemical biology · 2024Review
- Article
- Systematic discovery of protein interaction interfaces using AlphaFold and experimental validation.Molecular systems biology · 2024Article
- Super High-Throughput Screening of Enzyme Variants by Spectral Graph Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- Identification of risk genes for Alzheimer's disease by gene embedding.Cell genomics · 2022Article
- InterPepScore: a deep learning score for improving the FlexPepDock refinement protocol.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Improving peptide-protein docking with AlphaFold-Multimer using forced sampling.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Modelling peptide-protein complexes: docking, simulations and machine learning.QRB discovery · 2022Article
- Graph Neural Networks and Their Current Applications in Bioinformatics.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peptide-protein interactions between a smaller or disordered peptide stretch and a folded receptor make up a large part of all protein-protein interactions. A common approach for modeling such interactions is to exhaustively sample the conformational space by fast-Fourier-transform docking, and then refine a top percentage of decoys. Commonly, methods capable of ranking the decoys for selection fast enough for larger scale studies rely on first-principle energy terms such as electrostatics, Van der Waals forces, or on pre-calculated statistical potentials. We present InterPepRank for peptide-protein complex scoring and ranking. InterPepRank is a machine learning-based method which encodes the structure of the complex as a graph; with physical pairwise interactions as edges and evolutionary and sequence features as nodes. The graph network is trained to predict the LRMSD of decoys by using edge-conditioned graph convolutions on a large set of peptide-protein complex decoys. InterPepRank is tested on a massive independent test set with no targets sharing CATH annotation nor 30% sequence identity with any target in training or validation data. On this set, InterPepRank has a median AUC of 0.86 for finding coarse peptide-protein complexes with LRMSD < 4Å. This is an improvement compared to other state-of-the-art ranking methods that have a median AUC between 0.65 and 0.79. When included as a selection-method for selecting decoys for refinement in a previously established peptide docking pipeline, InterPepRank improves the number of medium and high quality models produced by 80% and 40%, respectively. The InterPepRank program as well as all scripts for reproducing and retraining it are available from:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.