ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2021
Peptimetric: Quantifying and Visualizing Differences in Peptidomic Data.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Finding new sustainable means of diagnosing and treating diseases is one of the most pressing issues of our time. In recent years, several endogenous peptides have been found to be both excellent biomarkers for many diseases and to possess important physiological roles which may be utilized in treatments. The detection of peptides has been facilitated by the rapid development of biological mass spectrometry and now the combination of fast and sensitive high resolution MS instruments and stable nano HP-LC equipment sequences thousands of peptides in one single experiment. In most research conducted with these advanced systems, proteolytically cleaved proteins are analyzed and the specific peptides are identified by software dedicated for protein quantification using different proteomics workflows. Analysis of endogenous peptides with peptidomics workflows also benefit from the novel sensitive and advanced instrumentation, however, the generated peptidomic data is vast and subsequently laborious to visualize and examine, creating a bottleneck in the analysis. Therefore, we have created Peptimetric, an application designed to allow researchers to investigate and discover differences between peptidomic samples. Peptimetric allows the user to dynamically and interactively investigate the proteins, peptides, and some general characteristics of multiple samples, and is available as a web application at https://peptimetric.herokuapp.com. To illustrate the utility of Peptimetric, we've applied it to a peptidomic dataset of 15 urine samples from diabetic patients and corresponding data from healthy subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.