Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36303752›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2021

The Effect of Model Directionality on Cell-Type-Specific Differential DNA Methylation Analysis.

Elior Rahmani, Brandon Jew, Eran Halperin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elior RahmaniDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Brandon JewBioinformatics Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Eran HalperinDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calling differential methylation at a cell-type level from tissue-level bulk data is a fundamental challenge in genomics that has recently received more attention. These studies most often aim at identifying statistical associations rather than causal effects. However, existing methods typically make an implicit assumption about the direction of effects, and thus far, little to no attention has been given to the fact that this directionality assumption may not hold and can consequently affect statistical power and control for false positives. We demonstrate that misspecification of the model directionality can lead to a drastic decrease in performance and increase in risk of spurious findings in cell-type-specific differential methylation analysis, and we discuss the need to carefully consider model directionality before choosing a statistical method for analysis.

Indexed as

cell-type-specificcomputational biologydifferential methylationDNA methyaltionepigenome-wide association studiesEWASstatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID36303752
PMCPMC9580934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.