Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36303581›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering

Mapping the Impact of Non-Linear Gradient Fields on Diffusion MRI Tensor Estimation.

Praitayini Kanakaraj, Colin B Hansen, Francois Rheault, Leon Y Cai, Karthik Ramadass, Baxter P Rogers, Kurt G Schilling, Bennett A Landman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mapping the Impact of Approximate Gradient Nonlinearity Fields Correction on Tractography.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Praitayini KanakarajDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Colin B HansenDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Francois RheaultDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Leon Y CaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Karthik RamadassDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Baxter P RogersVanderbilt University Institute for Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kurt G SchillingVanderbilt University Institute for Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bennett A LandmanDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3M
Postdoctoral Training in Biomedical MRI and MRST32EB001628 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI John C Gore · 2003 to 2026
$7.0M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM152284 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher S. Williams · 2024 to 2026
$4.8M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001628NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-linear gradients impact diffusion weighted (DW) MRI by corrupting the experimental setup and lead to problems during image encoding including the effects in-plane distortion, in-plane shifts, intensity modulations and phase errors. Recent studies have been shown this may present significant complication in the interpretation of results and conclusion while studying tractography and tissue microstructure in data. To interpret the degree in consequences of gradient non-linearities between the desired and achieved gradients, we introduced empirically derived gradient nonlinear fields at different orientations and different tensor properties. The impact is assessed through diffusion tensor properties including mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA) and principal eigen vector (PEV). The study shows lower FA are more susceptible to LR fields and LR fields with determinant <1 or >1 corrupt tensor more. The corruption can result in significantly different FA based on true-FA and LR field. Apparent MD decreases for negative determinant, on the other hand positive determinant shows the opposite effect. LR field have a larger impact on PEV when FA value is small. The results are dependent on the underlying orientation, non-linear field corruption can cause both increase and decrease of estimated FA, MD and PEV value. This work provides insight into characterizing the non-linear gradient error and aid in selecting correction techniques to address the inaccuracies in b-values.

Indexed as

gradient non-linearityMagnetic resonance distortiontensor simulation

Identifiers

PMID36303581
PMCPMC9604130
OpenAlexW4220956185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.