Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36303579›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering

Variational Inference for Quantifying Inter-observer Variability in Segmentation of Anatomical Structures.

Xiaofeng Liu, Fangxu Xing, Thibault Marin, Georges El Fakhri, Jonghye Woo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mixture-of-Shape-Experts (MoSE): End-to-End Shape Dictionary Framework to Prompt SAM for Generalizable Medical Segmentation.Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Workshops · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaofeng LiuGordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Fangxu XingGordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Thibault MarinGordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Georges El FakhriGordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Jonghye WooGordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114 USA.

Funding

Unified Joint Statistical Reconstruction of PET & MRP41EB022544 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Kira Grogg · 2017 to 2026
$14.8M
Quantitative Oncologic PET-MRR01CA165221 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EL FAKHRI, GEORGES · 2012 to 2023
$4.7M
Methods for Quantitative Neuroimaging of Tau Burden inPre-symptomatic ADR01AG076153 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Georges El Fakhri, Marc David Normandin · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
A holistic approach to identifying functional units of tongue motion during speechR01DC018511 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WOO, JONGHYE · 2020 to 2024
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165221NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076153NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB022544NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lesions or organ boundaries visible through medical imaging data are often ambiguous, thus resulting in significant variations in multi-reader delineations, i.e., the source of aleatoric uncertainty. In particular, quantifying the inter-observer variability of manual annotations with Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging data plays a crucial role in establishing a reference standard for various diagnosis and treatment tasks. Most segmentation methods, however, simply model a mapping from an image to its single segmentation map and do not take the disagreement of annotators into consideration. In order to account for inter-observer variability, without sacrificing accuracy, we propose a novel variational inference framework to model the distribution of plausible segmentation maps, given a specific MR image, which explicitly represents the multi-reader variability. Specifically, we resort to a latent vector to encode the multi-reader variability and counteract the inherent information loss in the imaging data. Then, we apply a variational autoencoder network and optimize its evidence lower bound (ELBO) to efficiently approximate the distribution of the segmentation map, given an MR image. Experimental results, carried out with the QUBIQ brain growth MRI segmentation datasets with seven annotators, demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Identifiers

PMID36303579
PMCPMC9603619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.