ReviewaBIOTECH2020
The molecular regulation of cell pluripotency in plants.
Review in aBIOTECH, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regeneration from seeds with physical defects: Contrasts in survival strategies in recalcitrant and orthodox seeds.Plant diversity · 2026Review
- HcBBM promotes callus differentiation and shoot regeneration by coordinating auxin signaling in Hemsleya chinensis.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Root Meristem Maintenance Mechanisms are Key to Plant Defense Against Nanoplastics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Callus culture-derived regeneration and molecular characterization of regeneratedFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Functional Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Glucosinolate O-methyltransferase mediated callus formation and affected ROS homeostasis inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024Article
- Promoting genotype-independent plant transformation by manipulating developmental regulatory genes and/or using nanoparticles.Plant cell reports · 2023Review
- A Common Molecular Signature Indicates the Pre-Meristematic State of Plant Calli.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Regulatory roles of noncoding RNAs in callus induction and plant cell dedifferentiation.Plant cell reports · 2023Review
- New Insights Into Tissue Culture Plant-Regeneration Mechanisms.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Genotype-independent plant transformation.Horticulture research · 2022Article
- Interpreting Cytokinin Action as Anterograde Signaling and Beyond.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plants have a remarkably regenerative capability to replace the damaged organs or form the new organs and individuals both in vivo and in vitro, which is fundamental for their developmental plasticity and the agricultural practices. The regenerative capacities of plants are highly dependent on the totipotency or pluripotency of somatic cells, whose fates are directed by phytohormones, wounding, and other stimuli. Recent studies have revealed that the two types of cellular reprogramming are involved in the acquisition of cell pluripotency during plant in vitro and in vivo regeneration programs. This review focuses on the recent advances of the cellular origin, molecular characteristic, and genetic and epigenetic regulations of cell pluripotency acquisition in plants, highlighting the molecular frameworks of cellular reprogramming activated by diverse stimuli and their possible potentials in regeneration-based plant biotechnologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.