Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36303516›Full record

ArticleAndrology2023

Complete meiosis in rat prepubertal testicular tissue under in vitro sequential culture conditions.

Justine Saulnier, Mathilde Soirey, Nasreddine Kébir, Marion Delessard, Aurélie Rives-Feraille, Laura Moutard, Ludovic Dumont, Nathalie Rives, Christine Rondanino

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Andrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justine SaulnierINSERM, U1239, Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology team, Laboratory of Neuroendocrine Endocrine and Germinal Differentiation and Communication, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Normandy University, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2161-0919
Mathilde SoireyINSERM, U1239, Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology team, Laboratory of Neuroendocrine Endocrine and Germinal Differentiation and Communication, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Normandy University, Rouen, France.
Nasreddine KébirNormandie Univ, INSA Rouen Normandie, Laboratoire PBS, Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5390-157X
Marion DelessardINSERM, U1239, Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology team, Laboratory of Neuroendocrine Endocrine and Germinal Differentiation and Communication, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Normandy University, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9377-5531
Aurélie Rives-FerailleINSERM, U1239, Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology team, Laboratory of Neuroendocrine Endocrine and Germinal Differentiation and Communication, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Normandy University, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5748-6342
Laura MoutardINSERM, U1239, Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology team, Laboratory of Neuroendocrine Endocrine and Germinal Differentiation and Communication, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Normandy University, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2412-4377
Ludovic DumontINSERM, U1239, Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology team, Laboratory of Neuroendocrine Endocrine and Germinal Differentiation and Communication, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Normandy University, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6882-6413
Nathalie RivesINSERM, U1239, Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology team, Laboratory of Neuroendocrine Endocrine and Germinal Differentiation and Communication, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Normandy University, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9102-1111
Christine RondaninoINSERM, U1239, Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology team, Laboratory of Neuroendocrine Endocrine and Germinal Differentiation and Communication, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Normandy University, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1100-9401
Inserm · FRNormandie Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTesticular tissue cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments allows fertility preservation in children suffering from cancer. Fertility restoration strategies, in particular in vitro maturation of prepubertal testicular tissue, are being developed mainly in animal models. The rat, widely used in biomedical research, including in reproductive biology, is a relevant model.

objectivesTo determine whether sequential two-step culture protocols can improve the efficiency of rat in vitro spermatogenesis. MATERIALS AND

methodsRat prepubertal testicular tissues were cultured on agarose gels with either a one-step or two-step protocol with or without polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) ceiling chips. The progression of spermatogenesis, germ/Sertoli cell ratio, cell proliferation, seminiferous tubule area, and intratubular cell density were assessed by histological and immunohistochemical analyses. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assays and Peanut Agglutinin (PNA) lectin labeling were performed to analyze the Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) integrity and differentiation step of in vitro-produced spermatids.

resultsSequential two-step protocols allowed the production of spermatids with a higher efficiency compared with the one-step culture protocol. However, the efficiency was low, as less than 1.5% of tubules contained spermatids. Most of the in vitro-produced spermatids contained unfragmented DNA and were at an early step of differentiation. Rare elongating spermatids could be detected in the cultured explants. Although complete in vitro spermatogenesis could not be obtained with PDMS ceiling chips, entry into meiosis was promoted in one-step organotypic cultures. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionComplete in vitro meiosis and the beginning of the elongation phase of spermiogenesis were obtained in a rat model using sequential culture methods. Because of their low efficiency, further work will be necessary to identify the culture conditions allowing the completion of spermiogenesis. These optimizations could pave the way for future applications, including the development of an in vitro fertility restoration procedure for childhood cancer survivors, which is still far from being clinically available.

Indexed as

Seminiferous TubulesTestisAnimalsDNAMaleMeiosisRatsSpermatogenesisDNAin vitro organ culturemeiosissequential conditionspermatogenesistestis

Identifiers

PMID36303516
PMCPMC10099474
OpenAlexW4307497980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.