Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36303439›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022

The Standing and Sitting Spino-Pelvic Sagittal Alignment in Patients with Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Might Correlate with Adjacent Segment Degeneration.

Siyu Zhou, Woquan Zhong, Zhuoran Sun, Yang Guo, Yi Zhao, Wei Li, Weishi Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Preoperative sacral slope change (ΔSS) as a risk factor for mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Siyu Zhou *Orthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Woquan Zhong *Orthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhuoran SunOrthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yang GuoDepartment of Orthopaedic, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yi ZhaoOrthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei LiOrthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Weishi LiOrthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9512-5436
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CNTianjin Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSitting is a common weight-bearing posture, like standing, but there still lacks enough understanding of sagittal alignment in sitting position for patients after lumbar fusion. This study aimed to investigate the accommodation of fixed spine from standing to sitting position and its influence on unfused segments.

methodsSixty-two patients after lumbar fusion (test group) and 40 healthy volunteers (control group) were recruited in this research. All subjects underwent lateral radiographs of entire spine in the standing and sitting positions. The spinopelvic parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and pelvic tilt (PT) were measured. The changes in parameters of patients between two positions were compared with control group, and patients were divided in different groups based on fusion level and their parameters were compared.

resultsWhen changing from standing to sitting positions, a forward-moving SVA and TPA were observed in both patients and control groups, accompanied by the decrease in LL, TK and increase in PT, but the changes of patients were smaller in TPA, LL, and TK (6.5° ± 7.2° vs 9.7° ± 6.0°, 7.7° ± 8.3° vs 13.6° ± 8.5°, 2.2° ± 6.5° vs 5.4° ± 5.1°, respectively, p < 0.05). Increase of PT in the lumbosacral fixation group was lower than that in the control group (4.4° ± 9.1° vs 8.3° ± 7.1°, p < 0.05). Patients who had adjacent segments degeneration (ASD) showed more kyphosis in unfused lumbar segments than the other patients (16.4° ± 10.7° vs -1.0° ± 4.8°, p < 0.05) from standing to sitting.

conclusionsThe spine straightens in lumbar and thoracic curve, combined with forward-moving axis and pelvic retroversion when changing to the sitting position. However, these changes are relatively limited in patients after lumbar fusion, so the adjacent unfused lumbar segments compensate to stress during sitting and this may be related to ASD.

Indexed as

Sitting PositionSpinal FusionStanding PositionHumansLumbar VertebraeAdjacent segment degenerationCorrection surgeryLumbar fusionSagittal alignmentSitting

Identifiers

PMID36303439
PMCPMC9732614
OpenAlexW4307498807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.