Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36303181›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2022

Attitudes towards human milk banking among native turkish and refugee women residing in a rural region of Turkey: a mixed-methods approach.

Ceren Varer Akpinar, Aliye Mandiracioglu, Safiye Ozvurmaz, Filiz Adana, Nazife Koc, Fatma Kurt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ceren Varer AkpinarFaculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey. varerceren@gmail.com.
Aliye MandiraciogluFaculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Safiye OzvurmazFaculty of Nursing, Department of Public Health Nursing, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.
Filiz AdanaFaculty of Nursing, Department of Public Health Nursing, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.
Nazife KocHome Patient Care Services, Istanbul Rumeli University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Fatma KurtFaculty of Nursing, Department of Public Health Nursing, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.
Adnan Menderes University · TREge University · TRGiresun University · TRTC İstanbul Rumeli Üniversitesi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman milk banks (HMB) play an essential role by providing human milk to infants who would otherwise not be able to receive mother's milk. There is currently no donor milk bank in Turkey. For any new health intervention to be successful, determining its acceptability is a vital first step. This study intends to determine the opinions, knowledge, and attitudes of native Turkish and refugee women living in Çeştepe, Aydın, a rural area in Turkey, about HMB.

methodsA population-based cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted. Qualitative study data were collected through in-depth interviews with 33 women, and quantitative study data were collected using a questionnaire. A total of 271 women in the region were included in the study. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed and then a conceptual framework was created. Logistic regression was performed for quantitative data.

resultsFifty-seven point nine per cent of the women were willing to donate breast milk, whereas only 27.7% were willing to use donor milk for their babies. Religious concerns, fear of infectious diseases, and distrust in people they did not know were among the reasons for the negative attitudes of the women. Fear of infectious diseases was mentioned specifically by native Turkish women, and religious concerns were reported both by native Turkish and refugee women. The importance of breast milk and religion were among the reasons for positive attitudes. Additionally, odds of having a positive attitude were 4.19 times higher in homemaker women (95% CI 2.0, 8.76); 4.77 times higher in women with three or more children (95% CI 1.25, 8.15); 6.12 times higher in women who had a positive attitude towards wet nursing (95% CI 3.14, 9.63); and 2.68 times higher in those who had previously heard about human milk banking (95% CI 1.24, 5.79).

conclusionAttitudes towards HMB are affected by religion, cultural beliefs, and concerns about the safety of breast milk in HMBs. Refugees and native Turkish women are found to have similar religious concerns. These findings should be taken into consideration in human milk banking initiatives and in activities to increase acceptance by the public.

Indexed as

Milk BanksRefugeesBreast FeedingChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantMilk, HumanTurkeyBreastfeedingHuman milk bankingQualitativeWet nursing

Identifiers

PMID36303181
PMCPMC9615202
OpenAlexW4307442761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.