Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36303096›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2023

Population dynamics of Rhipicephalus microplus in dairy cattle: influence of the animal categories and correlation with milk production.

Rubens Dias de Melo Júnior, Lorena Lopes Ferreira, Dina María Beltrán Zapa, Luciana Maffini Heller, Hariye Victória Iuasse, Raphaela Barbosa Naves, Artur Siqueira Nunes Trindade, Lídia Mendes de Aquino Gontijo, Alexandre Braga Scarpa, Daniel Sobreira Rodrigues and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Does fluralaner (ExzoltParasites & vectors · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rubens Dias de Melo JúniorEscola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Lorena Lopes FerreiraDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Dina María Beltrán ZapaEscola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Luciana Maffini HellerEscola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Hariye Victória IuasseEscola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Raphaela Barbosa NavesEscola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Artur Siqueira Nunes TrindadeEscola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Lídia Mendes de Aquino GontijoEscola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Alexandre Braga ScarpaVeterinarian, Scarpa Consultoria Ltda, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.
Daniel Sobreira RodriguesEmpresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais, Campo Experimental Santa Rita, Prudente de Morais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Vando Edésio SoaresUniversidade Brasil, Descalvado, São Paulo, Brazil.
Caio Marcio de Oliveira MonteiroEscola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Welber Daniel Zanetti LopesEscola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. wdzlopes@hotmail.com.
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BRElabora Consultoria (Brazil) · BREmpresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Brasil · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Is well known the taurine and zebuine susceptibility to Rhipicephalus microplus. Few are the reports regarding tick population dynamics between the same herd/breed, and because of this, two experiments were performed. In the 1st, the cattle tick population dynamics in dairy nursing calves (reared collective and individually), weaning calves (4-16 months), heifers (17-29 months), cows in lactation and dry cows (≥ 30 months) from the same herd, tick burden and milk production correlation were performed, for two years. R. microplus females (4.5-8.0 mm) counts and the milk production were performed every 28 and 14 days, respectively. In the 2nd experiment, bovines belonging to different categories/age (newborn without previous contact with tick; 12-13 months with tick contact since birth; and 23-24 months with tick contact since birth) were experimentally infested with 30,000 R. microplus larvae, to quantify the number of fully engorged females detached from these animals. In the 1st experiment, when the mean counts of tick were ≥ 30 all animals of the group were treated. Nursing calves showed 3-4 peaks of ticks, animals reared individually showed smaller (p ≤ 0.05) tick burden than those reared collectively. Weaning calves (4-8 months) showed 5 tick peaks/year and higher mean tick burden was found than other categories. On the other hand, animals with 17-29 months of age showed smallest (p ≤ 0.05) tick burden, with 3 tick peaks/year. When the animal become lactating the tick burden increase, and 5 peaks/year occurred, and decrease again in dry cows (p ≤ 0.05) showing 4-5 tick peaks/year. Weaning calves and lactating cows received more acaricide treatments (p ≤ 0.05), 18 and 15, respectively. Nursing calves reared individually, and heifers (21-29 months) were the categories that received two acaricide treatments. The more milk the cow produce, more ticks it has (p ≤ 0.05). In the 2nd experiment, more (p ≤ 0.05) fully engorged females were recovered from younger animals than older ones. So, different tick control strategies need to be adopted in different dairy cattle categories, and the tick burden should be considered, once the effect may be more inherent to the animal rather than the strategy adopted.

Indexed as

AcaricidesCattle DiseasesRhipicephalusTick InfestationsAnimalsCattleFemaleLactationMilkPopulation DynamicsAcaricidesCalvesCattle tickDaily milkLactating cowsTick countTick peaks

Identifiers

PMID36303096
OpenAlexW4307499993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.