Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36303062›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

The impact of the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic on childhood myopia control practice patterns among ophthalmologists-an international pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus council global perspective.

Jonathan Kfir, Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe, Sonal Farzavandi, Zhang Wei, Jason C Yam, Jan Tjeerd de Faber, Faruk H Orge, Igor Aznauryan, Chong-Bin Tsai, Rosario Gomez de Liano and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 14 institutions in 11 countries.

Jonathan Kfir *Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe *Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Sonal FarzavandiSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Zhang WeiTianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Jason C YamDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Jan Tjeerd de FaberThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Faruk H OrgeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Igor AznauryanScientific Education Center "Yasnyi Vzor", Moscow, Russian Federation.
Chong-Bin TsaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan.
Rosario Gomez de LianoHospital Clínico/Instituto Castroviejo, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Sundaram NatarajanAditya Jyot Eye Hospital Pvt.Ltd, Mumbai, India.
Subhash C DadeyaGuru Nanak Eye Centre &, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Siddharth AgrawalKing George,s, Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Miho SatoHamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Rachel ShemeshSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Eedy MezerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ruth Rappaport Children's Hospital, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel. emezer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-7538
CPMTPPO Study Group
Tel Aviv University · ILAditya Jyot Eye Hospital · INChia-Yi Christian Hospital · TWChinese University of Hong Kong · HKHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPInstitute of Electronic Measurements KVARZ (Russia) · RUKing George's Medical University · INMaulana Azad Medical College · INRainbow Babies & Children's Hospital · USRotterdam Eye Hospital · NLSingapore National Eye Center · SGTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILTianjin Medical University Eye Hospital · CNUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of myopia keeps increasing during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to map the worldwide treatment preferences of ophthalmologists managing myopia control during the first wave of the pandemic.

methodsAn online questionnaire inquiring about pharmacological and optical treatment patterns during the first half of 2020 was sent to pediatric ophthalmology as well as general ophthalmology memberships worldwide. The results among pediatric ophthalmologists were compared to a previous study we performed before the pandemic.

resultsA total of 2269 respondents from 94 countries were included. Most respondents were pediatric ophthalmologists (64.6%), followed by ophthalmologists from other subspecialties (32.3%). The preferred modality for all geographical regions was a combination therapy of pharmacological and optical treatments. When evaluated independently, the pharmacological treatment was more popular than the optical treatment in most regions other than East Asia (P < 0.001). Compared to a pre-pandemic questionnaire, the participation of pediatric ophthalmologists affiliated with non-university hospitals increased. Additionally, the prevalence of respondents utilizing either any type of pharmacological treatment and those that using only evidence-based treatments increased globally. Although a decline in the use of optical treatment was evident worldwide, the use of evidence-based optical treatments increased.

conclusionOphthalmologists around the world preferred a combination therapy of pharmacological and optical treatments. More pediatric ophthalmologists treated myopia progression and preferred a better evidence-based approach to control myopia. These trends reflect a positive response and more awareness of the rising prevalence of myopia due to the increased burden of myopia imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19MyopiaOphthalmologistsOphthalmologyStrabismusChildHumansPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19MyopiaOptical treatmentPharmacologic treatment

Identifiers

PMID36303062
PMCPMC9613446
OpenAlexW4307730282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.