Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36303000›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2022

Bridging landscape ecology and urban science to respond to the rising threat of mosquito-borne diseases.

Pallavi A Kache, Mauricio Santos-Vega, Anna M Stewart-Ibarra, Elizabeth M Cook, Karen C Seto, Maria A Diuk-Wasser

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Presence ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ExploitingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Towards a 'people and nature' paradigm for biodiversity and infectious disease.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Pallavi A KacheDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Mauricio Santos-VegaGrupo de Biología Matemática y Computacional, Departamento de Ingeniería Biomédica, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Anna M Stewart-IbarraInter-American Institute for Global Change Research, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Elizabeth M CookEnvironmental Science Department, Barnard College, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4290-7482
Karen C Seto *Yale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4928-2446
Maria A Diuk-Wasser *Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. mad2256@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8809-3050
Columbia University · USBarnard College · USInter-American Institute · UYUniversidad de Los Andes · COYale University · US

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of diseases borne by mosquitoes, particularly in the genus Aedes, is rising worldwide. This has been attributed, in part, to the dramatic rates of contemporary urbanization. While Aedes-borne disease risk varies within and between cities, few investigations use urban science-based approaches to examine how city structure and function contribute to vector or pathogen introduction and maintenance. Here, we integrate theories from complex adaptive systems, landscape ecology and urban geography to develop an urban systems framework for understanding Aedes-borne diseases. The framework establishes that cities comprise hierarchically structured patches of different land uses and characteristics. Properties of the patches (that is, composition) determine localized disease risk, while configuration and connectivity drive emergent patterns of pathogen spread. Complexity is added by incorporating individual and collective human social structures, considering how feedbacks among social actors and with the landscape drive risk and transmission. We discuss how these concepts apply to case studies of Aedes-borne disease from around the world. Ultimately, the framework strengthens existing theoretical and mixed qualitative-quantitative approaches, and advances considerations of how interventions including urban planning (for example, piped water provisioning) and emerging vector control strategies (for example, Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes) can be implemented to prevent and control the rising threat of Aedes-borne diseases.

Indexed as

AedesVector Borne DiseasesAnimalsEcologyHumansMosquito VectorsUrbanization

Identifiers

PMID36303000
OpenAlexW4307494776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.