Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36302955›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2023

Recovery and genome reconstruction of novel magnetotactic Elusimicrobiota from bog soil.

Maria Uzun, Veronika Koziaeva, Marina Dziuba, Lolita Alekseeva, Maria Krutkina, Marina Sukhacheva, Roman Baslerov, Denis Grouzdev

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. GdbMTB: a manually curated genomic database of magnetotactic bacteria.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  4. MagnetotacticISME communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria UzunSkryabin Institute of Bioengineering Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3802-6906
Veronika KoziaevaSkryabin Institute of Bioengineering Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6000-8886
Marina DziubaSkryabin Institute of Bioengineering Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Lolita AlekseevaSkryabin Institute of Bioengineering Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Maria KrutkinaSciBear OU, Tallinn, Estonia.
Marina SukhachevaSkryabin Institute of Bioengineering Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Roman BaslerovSkryabin Institute of Bioengineering Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Denis GrouzdevSciBear OU, Tallinn, Estonia. denisgrouzdev@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1358-5146
Russian Academy of Sciences · RUStony Brook University · US

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) 20-34-90116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the minor part of the uncultivated microbial majority ("rare biosphere") is difficult even with modern culture-independent techniques. The enormity of microbial diversity creates particular challenges for investigating low-abundance microbial populations in soils. Strategies for selective sample enrichment to reduce community complexity can aid in studying the rare biosphere. Magnetotactic bacteria, apart from being a minor part of the microbial community, are also found in poorly studied bacterial phyla and certainly belong to a rare biosphere. The presence of intracellular magnetic crystals within magnetotactic bacteria allows for their significant enrichment using magnetic separation techniques for studies using a metagenomic approach. This work investigated the microbial diversity of a black bog soil and its magnetically enriched fraction. The poorly studied phylum representatives in the magnetic fraction were enriched compared to the original soil community. Two new magnetotactic species, Candidatus Liberimonas magnetica DUR002 and Candidatus Obscuribacterium magneticum DUR003, belonging to different classes of the relatively little-studied phylum Elusimicrobiota, were proposed. Their genomes contain clusters of magnetosome genes that differ from the previously described ones by the absence of genes encoding magnetochrome-containing proteins and the presence of unique Elusimicrobiota-specific genes, termed mae. The predicted obligately fermentative metabolism in DUR002 and lack of flagellar motility in the magnetotactic Elusimicrobiota broadens our understanding of the lifestyles of magnetotactic bacteria and raises new questions about the evolutionary advantages of magnetotaxis. The findings presented here increase our understanding of magnetotactic bacteria, soil microbial communities, and the rare biosphere.

Indexed as

MagnetosomesWetlandsBacteriaGenome, BacterialGram-Negative Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID36302955
PMCPMC9859788
OpenAlexW4307777314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.