Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36302879›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Pulse width and intensity effects of pulsed electric fields on cancerous and normal skin cells.

Xin Rao, Sophia Chen, Yasir Alfadhl, Xiaodong Chen, Lingling Sun, Liyang Yu, Jun Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Bioelectricity in dental medicine: a narrative review.Biomedical engineering online · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xin RaoSchool of Electronics and Information, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Sophia ChenSchool of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Yasir AlfadhlSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Xiaodong ChenSchool of Electronics and Information, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, China. xiaodong.chen@qmul.ac.uk.
Lingling SunSchool of Electronics and Information, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Liyang YuSchool of Electronics and Information, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Jun ZhouSchool of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China.
Hangzhou Dianzi University · CNImperial College London · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsecond pulsed electric fields (PEF) have previously been used for various tumour therapies, such as gene therapy, electrochemotherapy and irreversible electroporation (IRE), due to its demonstrated ability. However, recently nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) have also been used as a potential tumor therapy via inducing cell apoptosis or immunogenic cell death to prevent recurrence and metastasis by interacting with intracellular organelles. A large proportion of the existing in-vitro studies of nsPEF on cells also suggests cell necrosis and swelling/blebbing can be induced, but the replicability and potential for other effects on cells suggesting a complicated process which requires further investigation. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of pulse width and intensity of nsPEF on the murine melanoma cells (B16) and normal murine fibroblast cells (L929) through electromagnetic simulation and in-vitro experiments. Through examining the evolution patterns of potential difference and electric fields on the intracellular compartments, the simulation has shown a differential effect of nsPEF on normal and cancerous skin cells, which explains well the results observed in the reported experiments. In addition, the modelling has provided a clear evidence that a few hundreds of ns PEF may have caused a mixed mode of effects, i.e. a 'cocktail effect', including cell electroporation and IRE due to an over their threshold voltage induced on the plasma membrane, as well as cell apoptosis and other biological effects caused by its interaction with the intracellular compartments. The in-vitro experiments in the pulse range of the hundreds of nanoseconds showed a possible differential cytotoxicity threshold of electric field intensity between B16 cells and L929 cells.

Indexed as

ElectrochemotherapySkin NeoplasmsAnimalsApoptosisElectricityElectroporationHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID36302879
PMCPMC9613658
OpenAlexW4307774265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.