ArticleScientific reports2022
Automatic identification of early ischemic lesions on non-contrast CT with deep learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep-learning-based non-contrast CT for detecting acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and HSROC meta-analysis of patient-level diagnostic accuracy.BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Deep learning-based optical coherence tomography and retinal images for detection of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic and meta analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Unified multimodal learning for stroke triage: joint detection, scoring, and segmentation of acute ischemic stroke.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- TrustNet: a lightweight network with integrated uncertainty quantification and quantitative explainable AI for ischemic stroke detection in CT images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Robust slice-level stroke classification in non-contrast head CT via structural consistency regularization and counterfactual suppression.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Localization of early infarction on non-contrast CT images in acute ischemic stroke with deep learning approach.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early ischemic lesion on non-contrast computed tomogram (NCCT) in acute stroke can be subtle and need confirmation with magnetic resonance (MR) image for treatment decision-making. We retrospectively included the NCCT slices of 129 normal subjects and 546 ischemic stroke patients (onset < 12 h) with corresponding MR slices as reference standard from a prospective registry of Chang Gung Research Databank. In model selection, NCCT slices were preprocessed and fed into five different pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models including Visual Geometry Group 16 (VGG16), Residual Networks 50, Inception-ResNet-v2, Inception-v3, and Inception-v4. In model derivation, the customized-VGG16 model could achieve an accuracy of 0.83, sensitivity 0.85, F-score 0.80, specificity 0.82, and AP 0.82 after using a tenfold cross-validation method, outperforming the pre-trained VGG16 model. In model evaluation, the customized-VGG16 model could correctly identify 53 in 58 subjects (91.37%) including 29 ischemic stroke patients and 24 normal subjects and reached the sensitivity of 86.95% in identifying ischemic NCCT slices (200/230), irrespective of supratentorial or infratentorial lesions. The customized-VGG16 CNN model can successfully identify the presence of early ischemic lesions on NCCT slices using the concept of automatic feature learning. Further study will be proceeded to detect the location of ischemic lesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.