Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36302837›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Exploiting the Bayesian approach to derive counts of married women of reproductive age across Cameroon for healthcare planning, 2000-2030.

Raïssa Shiyghan Nsashiyi, Md Mizanur Rahman, Lawrence Monah Ndam, Masahiro Hashizume

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raïssa Shiyghan NsashiyiDepartment of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. raissa.nsashiyi@gmail.com.
Md Mizanur RahmanHitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, University of Hitotsubashi, 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi, Tokyo, 186-8601, Japan.
Lawrence Monah NdamDepartment of Agronomic and Applied Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Masahiro HashizumeDepartment of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimates of married women of reproductive age (MWRA) are needed for policy decisions to enhance reproductive health. Given the unavailability in Cameroon, this study aimed to derive MWRA counts by regions and divisions from 2000 to 2030. Data included 1976, 1987, and 2005 censuses with 606,542 women, five Demographic and Health Surveys from 1991 to 2018 with 48,981 women, and United Nations World Population Prospects from 1976 to 2030. Bayesian models were used in estimating fertility rates, net-migration, and finally, MWRA counts. The total MWRA population in Cameroon was estimated to increase from 2,260,665 (2,198,569-2,352,934) to 6,124,480 (5,862,854-6,482,921), reflecting a 5.7 (5.2-6.2) percentage points (%p) annual rise from 2000-2030. The Centre and Far North regions host the largest numbers, projected to reach 1,264,514 (1,099,373-1,470,021) and 1,069,814 (985,315-1,185,523), respectively, in 2030. The highest divisional-level increases are expected in Mfoundi [14.6%p (11.2-18.8)] and Bénoué [14.9%p (11.1-20.09). This study's findings, showing varied regional- and divisional-level estimates of and trends in MWRA counts should set a baseline for determining the demand for programmes such as family planning, and the scaling of relevant resources sub-nationally.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesBayes TheoremCameroonDelivery of Health CareDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID36302837
PMCPMC9613669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.