ArticleScientific reports2022
Identifying accurate link predictors based on assortativity of complex networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Link prediction algorithms in complex networks, such as social networks, biological networks, drug-drug interactions, communication networks, and so on, assign scores to predict potential links between two nodes. Link prediction (LP) enables researchers to learn unknown, new as well as future interactions among the entities being modeled in the complex networks. In addition to measures like degree distribution, clustering coefficient, centrality, etc., another metric to characterize structural properties is network assortativity which measures the tendency of nodes to connect with similar nodes. In this paper, we explore metrics that effectively predict the links based on the assortativity profiles of the complex networks. To this end, we first propose an approach that generates networks of varying assortativity levels and utilize three sets of link prediction models combining the similarity of neighborhoods and preferential attachment. We carry out experiments to study the LP accuracy (measured in terms of area under the precision-recall curve) of the link predictors individually and in combination with other baseline measures. Our analysis shows that link prediction models that explore a large neighborhood around nodes of interest, such as CH2-L2 and CH2-L3, perform consistently for assortative as well as disassortative networks. While common neighbor-based local measures are effective for assortative networks, our proposed combination of common neighbors with node degree is a good choice for the LP metric in disassortative networks. We discuss how this analysis helps achieve the best-parameterized combination of link prediction models and its significance in the context of link prediction from incomplete social and biological network data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.