Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36302826›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Identifying accurate link predictors based on assortativity of complex networks.

Ahmad F Al Musawi, Satyaki Roy, Preetam Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmad F Al MusawiDepartment of Information Technology, University of Thi Qar, Thi Qar, Iraq. almusawiaf@utq.edu.iq.
Satyaki RoyDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Preetam GhoshDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Link prediction algorithms in complex networks, such as social networks, biological networks, drug-drug interactions, communication networks, and so on, assign scores to predict potential links between two nodes. Link prediction (LP) enables researchers to learn unknown, new as well as future interactions among the entities being modeled in the complex networks. In addition to measures like degree distribution, clustering coefficient, centrality, etc., another metric to characterize structural properties is network assortativity which measures the tendency of nodes to connect with similar nodes. In this paper, we explore metrics that effectively predict the links based on the assortativity profiles of the complex networks. To this end, we first propose an approach that generates networks of varying assortativity levels and utilize three sets of link prediction models combining the similarity of neighborhoods and preferential attachment. We carry out experiments to study the LP accuracy (measured in terms of area under the precision-recall curve) of the link predictors individually and in combination with other baseline measures. Our analysis shows that link prediction models that explore a large neighborhood around nodes of interest, such as CH2-L2 and CH2-L3, perform consistently for assortative as well as disassortative networks. While common neighbor-based local measures are effective for assortative networks, our proposed combination of common neighbors with node degree is a good choice for the LP metric in disassortative networks. We discuss how this analysis helps achieve the best-parameterized combination of link prediction models and its significance in the context of link prediction from incomplete social and biological network data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster Analysis

Identifiers

PMID36302826
PMCPMC9613685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.