ArticleScientific reports2022
Using CFD simulations to investigate the shear stress in hydrodynamic cavitation reactors coupled with experimental validation using colony count measurements.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydrodynamic Cavitation in Juice Processing: Linking PME, PPO, and POD Responses to Physicochemical Stability and Quality Retention.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current work investigates the shear stress distribution in hydrodynamic cavitation reactors with two different geometries using CFD simulations. Venturi type (positive geometry) and bore (negative geometry) were used to induce cavitation. Experimental validation of the predictions from simulations was also conducted by calculating the reduction rate in the colony count of Legionella pneumophila, a pathogenic bacterial strain. Both the numerical and experimental studies revealed the significant influence of the shape of the cavitation-inducing geometry on the flow characteristics and the distribution of shear stress. The simulation data indicated high shear stress formation in the positive geometry as a venturi, with the cavitation ranges for the two reactors being far apart from each other. The experimental study also confirmed that the flow conditions in the venturi-type reactor were more favourable compared to the bore geometry, resulting in a bacterial reduction efficiency as high as 99.98%. It was clearly demonstrated that the geometry of the cavitating device plays a crucial role in deciding the shear stress and its efficacy for the desired applications as per the predictions of the simulation model validated by the experimental results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.