Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36302654›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2022

Nanoparticle Diagnostics and Theranostics in the Clinic.

Roger M Pallares, Felix M Mottaghy, Volkmar Schulz, Fabian Kiessling, Twan Lammers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Effect of clinically relevant iron oxide nanoparticles on macrophage polarization, tumor growth and tumor microenvironment modulation.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical translation and landscape of silver nanoparticles.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roger M PallaresInstitute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany; rmoltopallar@ukaachen.de tlammers@ukaachen.de.
Felix M MottaghyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Volkmar SchulzInstitute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Fabian KiesslingInstitute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Twan LammersInstitute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany; rmoltopallar@ukaachen.de tlammers@ukaachen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles possess unique features that may be useful for disease diagnosis and therapy. Preclinically, many different nanodiagnostics have been explored, but only a few have made it to the market. We here provide an overview of nanoparticle-based imaging agents currently used and evaluated in the clinic and discuss preclinical progress and translational avenues for the use of nanoparticles for diagnostic and theranostic applications.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesNeoplasmsHumansPrecision MedicineTheranostic Nanomedicinemolecular imagingnanodiagnosticsnanomedicinenanoparticlesoncologytheranostics

Identifiers

PMID36302654
PMCPMC9730918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.