Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36302216›Full record

SynthesisEmerging microbes & infections2022

Risk factors and preventive interventions for post Covid-19 condition: systematic review.

Jennifer Pillay, Sholeh Rahman, Samantha Guitard, Aireen Wingert, Lisa Hartling

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Emerging microbes & infections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Definitions and symptoms of the post-COVID syndrome: an updated systematic umbrella review.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [Post-COVID-19 syndrome].Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer PillayAlberta Research Centre for Health Evidence (ARCHE), Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6086-7229
Sholeh RahmanAlberta Research Centre for Health Evidence (ARCHE), Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Samantha GuitardAlberta Research Centre for Health Evidence (ARCHE), Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Aireen WingertAlberta Research Centre for Health Evidence (ARCHE), Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Lisa HartlingAlberta Research Centre for Health Evidence (ARCHE), Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8341-3991
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review examined pre-existing and clinical risk factors for post Covid-19 condition (≥12 weeks after onset), and interventions during acute and post-acute phases of illness that could potentially prevent post Covid-19 condition. The review focuses on studies collecting data during the early phases of the pandemic and prior to the emergence of variants of concern and widespread vaccination. We searched bibliographic databases and grey literature. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles, and data extraction and risk of bias assessments were verified. Meta-analysis was performed when suitable and we assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. We included 31 studies. We found small-to-moderate associations (e.g. adjusted odds ratios 1.5 to <2.0) between female sex and higher non-recovery, fatigue, and dyspnea (moderate certainty). Severe or critical acute-phase Covid-19 severity (versus not) has probably (moderate certainty) a large association (adjusted ratio ≥2.0) with increased cognitive impairment, a small-to-moderate association with more non-recovery, and a little-to-no association with dyspnea. There may be (low certainty) large associations between hospitalization and increased non-recovery, increased dyspnea, and reduced return to work. Other outcomes had low certainty of small-to-moderate or little-to-no association or very low certainty. Several potential preventive interventions were examined, but effects are very uncertain. Guidelines in relation to surveillance, screening, and other services such as access to sickness and disability benefits, might need to focus on females and those with previously severe Covid-19 illness. Continuous assessment of emerging evidence, especially on whether different variants and vaccination impact outcomes, will be important. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021270354.

Indexed as

COVID-19DyspneaFemaleHumansPandemicsRisk FactorsVaccinationinterventionsPost COVID-19 conditionpreventionrisk factorssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36302216
PMCPMC9665097
OpenAlexW4307493182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.