Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36302058›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2022

A Prism Vote method for individualized risk prediction of traits in genotype data of Multi-population.

Xiaoxuan Xia, Yexian Zhang, Rui Sun, Yingying Wei, Qi Li, Marc Ka Chun Chong, William Ka Kei Wu, Benny Chung-Ying Zee, Hua Tang, Maggie Haitian Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaoxuan XiaCentre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5630-8803
Yexian ZhangCentre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0287-4065
Rui SunCentre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3537-2990
Yingying WeiDepartment of Statistics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Qi LiCentre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8943-3202
Marc Ka Chun ChongCentre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5610-1298
William Ka Kei WuCUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, China.
Benny Chung-Ying ZeeCentre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7238-845X
Hua TangDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, California, United States of America.
Maggie Haitian WangCentre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1223-4595

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-population cohorts offer unprecedented opportunities for profiling disease risk in large samples, however, heterogeneous risk effects underlying complex traits across populations make integrative prediction challenging. In this study, we propose a novel Bayesian probability framework, the Prism Vote (PV), to construct risk predictions in heterogeneous genetic data. The PV views the trait of an individual as a composite risk from subpopulations, in which stratum-specific predictors can be formed in data of more homogeneous genetic structure. Since each individual is described by a composition of subpopulation memberships, the framework enables individualized risk characterization. Simulations demonstrated that the PV framework applied with alternative prediction methods significantly improved prediction accuracy in mixed and admixed populations. The advantage of PV enlarges as genetic heterogeneity and sample size increase. In two real genome-wide association data consists of multiple populations, we showed that the framework considerably enhanced prediction accuracy of the linear mixed model in five-group cross validations. The proposed method offers a new aspect to analyze individual's disease risk and improve accuracy for predicting complex traits in genotype data.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticBayes TheoremGenomicsGenotypePhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID36302058
PMCPMC9642904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.