Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301990›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Water treatment at the point-of-use and treatment preferences among households in Ethiopia: A contemporaneous systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aiggan Tamene, Aklilu Habte, Demelash Woldeyohannes, Habtamu Tamrat, Fitsum Endale, Tekle Eajo, Abel Afework

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aiggan TameneSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-5504-0905
Aklilu HabteSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-5719-4294
Demelash WoldeyohannesSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia.
Habtamu TamratDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia.
Fitsum EndaleSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia.
Tekle EajoSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia.
Abel AfeworkDilla University Referral Hospital, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-9828-7446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWater is essential for maintaining human life, health, and dignity. Untreated water consumption causes 1.8 million deaths annually, over 99.8% of which happen in developing nations and 90% of which include children. Point-of-use water treatment enables people without reliable access to safe drinking water to reduce contamination and minimize microbial risk levels. This Systematic Review and Meta-analysis was, therefore, used to identify, select, and critically appraise relevant evidence about water treatment practices and their associated factors among Ethiopian households.

methodsPubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, ProQuest, and other databases were searched for studies published before May 5, 2022. The final synthesis included twelve investigations. Microsoft Excel was used to extract the data, and STATA 16 was used for the analysis. The Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical assessment checklist for prevalence studies was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Egger's test and funnel plot were used to assess publication bias. I2 statistics were calculated to check for study heterogeneity. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to analyze the pooled effect size, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals across studies. Analysis of subgroups was done by publication year and geographic region.

resultsOf the 550 identified articles, 12 studies were eligible for analysis (n = 4849 participants). The pooled prevalence estimate of point-of-use water treatment practice among Ethiopian homes was 36.07% (95% CI: 21.94-50.19, I2 = 99.5%). Receiving training from Community health workers (OR, 1.7; 95% CI: 1.33-2.08), female headship (OR, 2.52; 95% CI: 1.60-3.44), and household wealth (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 1.19-2.16) were significantly associated with point-of-use water treatment practice.

conclusionDespite the absence of safely managed water sources, very few homes routinely treated their drinking water. Adoption of water treatment practices necessitates ongoing communication and assistance from health extension personnel. Moreover, program planners must be aware of the many user categories that households may fall under to guarantee that ongoing training messages and treatment products reach every home.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterWater PurificationChildEthiopiaFemaleHumansOdds RatioPrevalenceDrinking Water

Identifiers

PMID36301990
PMCPMC9612552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.