Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301909›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Management and outcome of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture-A Low-Middle-Income Country Experience.

Saba Aijaz, Ghazal Peerwani, Asadullah Bugti, Sana Sheikh, Marium Mustaqeem, Sharwan Bhuro Mal, Ahson Memon, Ghufranullah Khan, Asad Pathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incidence and In-Hospital Mortality of Ventricular Septal Rupture Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Saba AijazDepartment of Clinical Research Cardiology, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8498-4227
Ghazal PeerwaniDepartment of Clinical Research Cardiology, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-2327-8684
Asadullah BugtiDepartment of Clinical Cardiology, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sana SheikhDepartment of Clinical Research Cardiology, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.
Marium MustaqeemDepartment of Clinical Cardiology, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sharwan Bhuro MalDepartment of Clinical Cardiology, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ahson MemonDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ghufranullah KhanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.
Asad PathanDepartment of Clinical Research Cardiology, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare complication after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) especially in the reperfusion era but its associated mortality has remained high. This case series evaluated in-hospital and intermediate-term mortality in VSR patients. Additionally, we also analyzed risk factors, clinical presentation, intervention, and predictors of in-hospital mortality in VSR patients.

methodsData of 67 patients with echocardiography confirmed diagnosis of VSR from January 2011 to April 2020 was extracted from hospital medical records. Records were also reviewed to document 30 day and 1-year mortality, recurrent heart failure admission, repeat myocardial infarction, and revascularization. In addition, telephonic follow-up was done to assess health-related quality of life(HRQOL) assessed by KCCQ-12. SCAI shock classification was used to categorize severity of cardiogenic shock. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of in-hospital mortality. Survival function was presented using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve.

resultsMean age of patients was 62.7 ± 11.1 years, 62.7% were males. 65.7% of the patients presented more than 24 hours after MI and did not receive reperfusion therapy. Median time from AMI to VSR diagnosis was 2 (1-5) days. VSR closure was attempted in 53.7% patients. In-hospital mortality was 65.7%. At univariate level, predictors of in-hospital mortality were non-surgical management, basal VSR, right ventricular dysfunction, early VSR post-MI, and severe cardiogenic shock at admission (class C, D, or E). Adjusted predictors of in-hospital mortality included non-surgical management, basal VSR and advanced cardiogenic shock. There were 5 deaths during median followup of 44.1 months. HRQOL in patients available on followup was good (54.5%) or excellent (45.5%).

conclusionHigh in-hospital mortality was seen in VSR patients. VSR closure is the preferred treatment to get long-term survival, however, timing of repair as well as severity of cardiogenic shock plays a significant role in determining prognosis.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionVentricular Septal RuptureAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsShock, CardiogenicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36301909
PMCPMC9612533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.