Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301816›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Community attitudes towards Amur tigers (Panthera tigris altaica) and their prey species in Yanbian, Jilin province, a region of northeast China where tigers are returning.

Ying Li, Joshua Powell, Aifen Jin, Hee Kyung Ryoo, Hailong Li, Puneet Pandey, Weihong Zhu, Dongwei Li, Hang Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Status of Wildlife Damage Compensation in China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying LiTiger & Leopard Conservation Fund in Korea (KTLCF), Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9889-8223
Joshua PowellTiger & Leopard Conservation Fund in Korea (KTLCF), Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3907-1853
Aifen JinCollege of Geography and Ocean Science, Yanbian University, Yanji, China.
Hee Kyung RyooSustainable Conservation Network, Yanji, Jilin, China.
Hailong LiCollege of Geography and Ocean Science, Yanbian University, Yanji, China.
Puneet PandeyTiger & Leopard Conservation Fund in Korea (KTLCF), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Weihong ZhuCollege of Geography and Ocean Science, Yanbian University, Yanji, China.
Dongwei LiHunchun Forestry Department, Hunchun, Jilin, China.
Hang LeeTiger & Leopard Conservation Fund in Korea (KTLCF), Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0264-6289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community attitudes towards large carnivores are of central importance to their conservation in human-dominated landscapes. In this study, we evaluate community attitudes and perceptions towards the Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica), Amur leopard (Panthera pardus orientalis) and bears (Ursus thibetanus and Ursus arctos), as well as their prey species, namely sika deer (Cervus nippon), roe deer and wild boar (Sus scrofa), in Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture, Jilin province, northeast China. We surveyed 139 households and found that community members' perceptions of large carnivores and their prey species were influenced by their predominant economic activities; their prior interactions with wildlife; their household income level; and whether they were either long-term residents of Yanbian or had migrated to the region from elsewhere in China. We recorded fairly neutral attitudes towards large carnivores among the communities we surveyed, but strongly negative attitudes were shown towards wild boar, particularly where respondents had lost agricultural products to crop raiding by wild boar. We recommend conservation stakeholders in northeast China utilise this finding to encourage support for large carnivore recovery and conservation by targeting messaging around the importance of the tiger as a key predator of wild boar in the ecosystem. Furthermore, our findings suggest that government provided compensation paid for cattle lost to large carnivore predation (notably, by tigers) may be helping to reduce animosity from cattle owners towards large carnivores. However, we also highlight that compensation for loss of livestock is therefore performing a useful role in mitigating human-wildlife conflict, that there are potentially unintended consequences of the current compensation program, for example it fails to dissuade livestock grazing in protected areas.

Indexed as

DeerPantheraTigersUrsidaeAnimalsAnimals, WildAttitudeCattleChinaConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHumansSus scrofaSwine

Identifiers

PMID36301816
PMCPMC9612539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.