Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301805›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Longitudinal serologic and viral testing post-SARS-CoV-2 infection and post-receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a nursing home cohort-Georgia, October 2020‒April 2021.

Farrell A Tobolowsky, Michelle A Waltenburg, Erin D Moritz, Melia Haile, Juliana C DaSilva, Amy J Schuh, Natalie J Thornburg, Adrianna Westbrook, Susannah L McKay, Stephen P LaVoie and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Immune Thrombocytopenia Onset and Relapse During the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Monocenter Study.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Farrell A TobolowskyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Michelle A WaltenburgCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8095-1433
Erin D MoritzCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Melia HaileCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9237-0217
Juliana C DaSilvaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Amy J SchuhCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8069-349X
Natalie J ThornburgCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3523-3616
Adrianna WestbrookCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9309-6205
Susannah L McKayCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2318-5189
Stephen P LaVoieCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6478-8453
Jennifer M FolsterCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Jennifer L HarcourtCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3271-4174
Azaibi TaminCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Megan M StumpfCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8085-3094
Lisa MillsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Brandi FreemanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Sandra LesterCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Elizabeth BeshearseCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Kristin D LecyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Laura G BrownCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Geroncio FajardoCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Jeanne NegleyGeorgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
L Clifford McDonaldCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Preeta K KuttyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Allison C BrownCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0011-0309
CDC Infection Prevention and Control Team
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USGeorgia Department of Public Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are limited data describing SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses and their durability following infection and vaccination in nursing home residents. We conducted a prospective longitudinal evaluation of 11 consenting SARS-CoV-2-positive nursing home residents to evaluate the quantitative titers and durability of binding antibodies detected after SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequent COVID-19 vaccination. The evaluation included nine visits over 150 days from October 25, 2020, through April 1, 2021. Visits included questionnaire administration, blood collection for serology, and paired anterior nasal specimen collection for testing by BinaxNOW™ COVID-19 Ag Card (BinaxNOW), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and viral culture. We evaluated quantitative titers of binding SARS-CoV-2 antibodies post-infection and post-vaccination (beginning after the first dose of the primary series). The median age among participants was 74 years; one participant was immunocompromised. Of 10 participants with post-infection serology results, 9 (90%) had detectable Pan-Ig, IgG, and IgA antibodies, and 8 (80%) had detectable IgM antibodies. At first antibody detection post-infection, two-thirds (6/9, 67%) of participants were RT-PCR-positive, but none were culture- positive. Ten participants received vaccination; all had detectable Pan-Ig, IgG, and IgA antibodies through their final observation ≤90 days post-first dose. Post-vaccination geometric means of IgG titers were 10-200-fold higher than post-infection. Nursing home residents in this cohort mounted robust immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 post-infection and post-vaccination. The augmented antibody responses post-vaccination are potential indicators of enhanced protection that vaccination may confer on previously infected nursing home residents.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesGeorgiaHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GNursing HomesProspective StudiesRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID36301805
PMCPMC9612440
OpenAlexW4307441983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.