ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Ten simple rules for writing a Registered Report.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An evidence mapping study based on systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine for hyperuricemia.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Improving research on developmental psychopathology with Registered Reports.Development and psychopathology · 2025Article
- Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Poor hypotheses and research waste in biology: learning from a theory crisis in psychology.BMC biology · 2025Review
- Reviewing manuscripts for scientific journals: recommendations for early career scientists.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Qualitative hypotheses.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- A guide for planning triangulation studies to investigate complex causal questions in behavioural and psychiatric research.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for successfully carrying out funded research projects.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Supporting study registration to reduce research waste.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Review
- A call for open science in forensics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Demystifying Open Science in health psychology and behavioral medicine: a practical guide to Registered Reports and Data Notes.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for designing and conducting undergraduate replication projects.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for socially responsible science.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.