Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301801›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Multiple health-related behaviours among Fly-In Fly-Out workers in the mining industry in Australia: A cross-sectional survey during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Asare, Elizabeth Thomas, Jacquita S Affandi, Myles Schammer, Chris Harris, Dominika Kwasnicka, Daniel Powell, Christopher M Reid, Suzanne Robinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah AsareHealth Psychology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1381-4981
Elizabeth ThomasCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
Jacquita S AffandiCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
Myles SchammerMineral Resources Limited, Applecross, Australia.
Chris HarrisMineral Resources Limited, Applecross, Australia.
Dominika KwasnickaFaculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland.
Daniel PowellHealth Psychology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Christopher M ReidCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9173-3944
Suzanne RobinsonCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
Curtin University · AUMineral Resources · AUUniversity of Aberdeen · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFly-In-Fly-Out (FIFO) workers travel to work at isolated locations, and rotate continuous workdays with leave periods at home, and such work practice is common in the offshore oil and gas and onshore mining industry worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic and accompanying public health actions appear to have had a negative impact on several health-related behaviours among the general population. However, little is known about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health behaviours of FIFO workers, who have shown higher pre-pandemic rates of risky behaviours than the general population in Australia. This study examined the health-related behaviours of FIFO workers in the mining industry during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. FIFO workers from an Australian mining company who underwent COVID-19 screening between May and November 2020 completed an online survey about their regular health-related behaviours. The independent sample t-test and Pearson's chi-square test where appropriate were conducted to examine the differences between males and females for the behavioural outcomes.

resultsA total of 768 FIFO workers (633 males and 135 females) participated in the study. Prevalence of smoking was high (32%). Males smoked more cigarettes per day than females (15.2±7.0 vs 13.1±7.1, p = .174). Most participants (74.7%) drank alcohol on more than two days per week. Compared to females, more males (20.2% vs 8.0%) consumed alcohol at short-term harmful levels (p = .010). About a third (34.4%) of the workers (33.5% of males and 38.5% of females, p = .264) engaged in inadequate moderate-vigorous exercises/physical activity. About a third (33.1%) of workers (33.7% of males and 30.4% of females; p = .699) had multiple risk behaviours.

conclusionsPrevalence of multiple risk behaviours was high. Interventions aimed at the prevention of risky health-related behaviours should target the different behavioural patterns and may require emphasis on gender-informed techniques particularly when addressing alcohol consumption.

Indexed as

COVID-19DipteraAnimalsAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMalePandemics

Identifiers

PMID36301801
PMCPMC9612538
OpenAlexW4307641195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.