Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301703›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2022

Integrating Biochar, Bacteria, and Plants for Sustainable Remediation of Soils Contaminated with Organic Pollutants.

Leilei Xiang, Jean Damascene Harindintwali, Fang Wang, Marc Redmile-Gordon, Scott X Chang, Yuhao Fu, Chao He, Bertrand Muhoza, Ferdi Brahushi, Nanthi Bolan and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Inoculation methods that enhance the survival of Bacillus strains in rice husk biochar for use as bacterial carriers.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Physiological and Agronomic Responses of Maize (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Leilei XiangCAS Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.
Jean Damascene HarindintwaliCAS Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.
Fang WangCAS Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9986-0948
Marc Redmile-GordonDepartment of Environmental Horticulture, Royal Horticultural Society, Wisley, Surrey GU23 6QB, U.K.
Scott X ChangDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7624-439X
Yuhao FuCAS Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.
Chao HeCAS Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.
Bertrand MuhozaCollege of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150030, China.
Ferdi BrahushiDepartment of Agroenvironment and Ecology, Agricultural University of Tirana, Tirana 1029, Albania.
Nanthi BolanSchool of Agriculture and Environment, The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2056-1692
Xin JiangCAS Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.
Yong Sik OkKorea Biochar Research Center, APRU Sustainable Waste Management Program & Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3401-0912
Jörg RinklebeDepartment of Soil and Groundwater Management, Bergische Universität, 42285 Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7404-1639
Andreas SchaefferInstitute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Yong-Guan ZhuUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3861-8482
James M TiedjeCenter for Microbial Ecology, Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Baoshan XingStockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2028-1295

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contamination of soil with organic pollutants has been accelerated by agricultural and industrial development and poses a major threat to global ecosystems and human health. Various chemical and physical techniques have been developed to remediate soils contaminated with organic pollutants, but challenges related to cost, efficacy, and toxic byproducts often limit their sustainability. Fortunately, phytoremediation, achieved through the use of plants and associated microbiomes, has shown great promise for tackling environmental pollution; this technology has been tested both in the laboratory and in the field. Plant-microbe interactions further promote the efficacy of phytoremediation, with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) often used to assist the remediation of organic pollutants. However, the efficiency of microbe-assisted phytoremediation can be impeded by (i) high concentrations of secondary toxins, (ii) the absence of a suitable sink for these toxins, (iii) nutrient limitations, (iv) the lack of continued release of microbial inocula, and (v) the lack of shelter or porous habitats for planktonic organisms. In this regard, biochar affords unparalleled positive attributes that make it a suitable bacterial carrier and soil health enhancer. We propose that several barriers can be overcome by integrating plants, PGPB, and biochar for the remediation of organic pollutants in soil. Here, we explore the mechanisms by which biochar and PGPB can assist plants in the remediation of organic pollutants in soils, and thereby improve soil health. We analyze the cost-effectiveness, feasibility, life cycle, and practicality of this integration for sustainable restoration and management of soil.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsSoil PollutantsBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalCharcoalEcosystemHumansPlantsSoilbiocharCharcoalEnvironmental PollutantsSoilSoil Pollutantsbiocharorganic pollutantsphytoremediationplant growth-promoting bacteriasoil pollution

Identifiers

PMID36301703
PMCPMC9730858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.