Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301614›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

A Tailored Gender-Sensitive mHealth Weight Loss Intervention (I-GENDO): Development and Process Evaluation.

Magdalena Pape, Tanja Färber, Caroline Seiferth, Tanja Roth, Stefanie Schroeder, Joerg Wolstein, Stephan Herpertz, Sabine Steins-Loeber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Food Addiction in Individuals With Overweight and Obesity Undergoing a 12-Week Long Tailored mHealth Weight Loss Intervention.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Trial
  3. Adherence to Behavioral Weight Management: A Scoping Review of Definitions, Measurement, and Components.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Magdalena PapeDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL-University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1952-8625
Tanja FärberDepartment of Pathopsychology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-682X
Caroline SeiferthDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7534-6151
Tanja RothDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL-University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7134-2997
Stefanie SchroederDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8119-4622
Joerg WolsteinDepartment of Pathopsychology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9338-8494
Stephan HerpertzDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL-University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-5683
Sabine Steins-LoeberDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7651-0627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity worldwide, the number of digital weight loss interventions has also risen. However, these interventions often lack theoretical background and data on long-term effectiveness. The consideration of individual and gender differences in weight-related psychological parameters might enhance the efficacy and sustainability of mobile-based weight loss interventions.

objectiveThis paper presented an introduction to and the process evaluation of a 12-week gender-sensitive mobile health (mHealth) weight loss intervention (I-GENDO) combining computer-based and self-tailoring features.

methodsBetween August 2020 and August 2021, individuals with overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m²), those with obesity class I (BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m²), and those with obesity class II (BMI 35.0-39.9 kg/m²) were recruited to the I-GENDO project, a multicenter study in Germany. The mHealth intervention aimed at targeting individual psychological factors associated with the development and persistence of overweight and obesity (eg, emotional eating) using computer-based tailoring. Moreover, the intervention took a gender-sensitive approach by implementing self-tailoring of gender-targeted module versions. The computer-based assignment of the main modules, self-selection of gender-targeted module versions, and use patterns were evaluated while considering gender. Moreover, gender differences in the usability assessment were analyzed.

resultsData from the intervention arm of the study were processed. A total of 116 individuals with overweight and obesity (77/116, 66.4% women; age mean 47.28, SD 11.66 years; BMI mean 33.58, SD 3.79 kg/m

conclusionsWe developed a tailored gender-sensitive mHealth weight loss intervention. The usability of and engagement with the intervention were satisfactory, and the overall satisfaction with the intervention was also high. Gender differences must be considered in the evaluation of the effectiveness and sustainability of the intervention.

Indexed as

eHealthgendermHealthmobile healthmobile phonetailoringweight loss intervention

Identifiers

PMID36301614
PMCPMC9650578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.