Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301602›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2022

The Current Status of Telemedicine Technology Use Across the World Health Organization European Region: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Francesc Saigí-Rubió, Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento, Noemí Robles, Keti Ivanovska, Che Katz, Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat, David Novillo Ortiz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Utility of Telehealth Platforms Applied to Burns Management: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Improving forensic healthcare: ARMED, a new telemedical examination.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Branding a New Technological Outlook for Future Orthopaedics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesc Saigí-Rubió *Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9616-1551
Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento *School of Medicine and University Hospital, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5240-0493
Noemí RoblesFaculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0740-9098
Keti IvanovskaFaculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8825-3886
Che KatzFaculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3928-6216
Natasha Azzopardi-MuscatDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9771-2770
David Novillo OrtizDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9756-0984

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral systematic reviews evaluating the use of telemedicine by clinicians, patients, and health authorities to improve the delivery of care in the 53 member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region have been conducted in recent years. However, a study summarizing the findings of these reviews has not been conducted.

objectiveThis overview of systematic reviews aimed to summarize findings regarding the use of telemedicine across the 53 member states and identify the medical fields and levels of care in and at which the effectiveness, feasibility, and applicability of telemedicine have been demonstrated. The barriers to and facilitators of telemedicine use were also evaluated and collated to help with the design and implementation of telemedicine interventions.

methodsThrough a comprehensive systematic evaluation of the published and unpublished literature, we extracted clinical, epidemiological, and technology-related data from each review included in the study. We focused on evaluating the barriers to and facilitators of the use of telemedicine apps across the 53 member states considered. We rated the methodological quality of each of the included reviews based on A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Review 2 approach and judged the overall certainty of evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. The entire process was performed by 2 independent authors.

resultsThis overview drew on data from >2239 primary studies, with >20,000 enrolled patients in total, within the WHO European Region. On the basis of data from randomized trials, observational studies, and economic evaluations from several countries, the results show a clear benefit of telemedicine technologies in the screening, diagnosis, management, treatment, and long-term follow-up of a series of chronic diseases. However, we were unable to pool the results into a reliable numeric parameter because of the high heterogeneity of intervention methodologies, scheduling, primary study design discrepancies, settings, and geographical locations. In addition to the clinical outcomes of the interventions, the social and economic outcomes are highlighted.

conclusionsThe application of telemedicine is well established across countries in the WHO European Region; however, some countries could still benefit from the many uses of these digital solutions. Barriers related to users, technology, and infrastructure were the largest. Conversely, the provision of health services using technological devices was found to significantly enhance patients' clinical outcomes, improve the long-term follow-up of patients by medical professionals, and offer logistical benefits for both patients and health workers.

trial registrationPROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42022309375; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=309375.

Indexed as

TelemedicineDelivery of Health CareHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicTechnologyWorld Health OrganizationEuropemobile phonetelemedicineWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID36301602
PMCPMC9650581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.