Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301601›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2023

Sexing Bones: Improving Transparency of Sex Reporting to Address Bias Within Preclinical Studies.

Aikta Sharma, Lysanne V Michels, Andrew A Pitsillides, Julie Greeves, Lillian I Plotkin, Valentina Cardo, Natalie A Sims, Claire E Clarkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aikta SharmaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5449-358X
Lysanne V MichelsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Andrew A PitsillidesDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
Julie GreevesArmy Health and Performance Research, Ministry of Defence, Andover, UK.
Lillian I PlotkinDepartment of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9537-4544
Valentina CardoWinchester School of Art, University of Southampton, Winchester, UK.
Natalie A SimsDepartment of Medicine at St. Vincent's Hospital, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research and The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1421-8468
Claire E ClarkinSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6859-5897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite knowledge that sexually dimorphic mechanisms regulate bone homeostasis, sex often remains unreported and unconsidered in preclinical experimental design. Failure to report sex could lead to inappropriate generalizations of research findings and less effective translation into clinical practice. Preclinical sex bias (preferential selection of one sex) is present across other fields, including neuroscience and immunology, but remains uninvestigated in skeletal research. For context, we first summarized key literature describing sexually dimorphic bone phenotypes in mice. We then investigated sex reporting practices in skeletal research, specifically how customary it is for murine sex to be included in journal article titles or abstracts and then determined whether any bias in sex reporting exists. Because sex hormones are important regulators of bone health (gonadectomy procedures, ie, ovariectomy [OVX] and orchidectomy [ORX], are common yet typically not reported with sex), we incorporated reporting of OVX and ORX terms, representing female and male mice, respectively, into our investigations around sex bias. Between 1999 and 2020, inclusion of sex in titles or abstracts was low in murine skeletal studies (2.6%-4.06%). Reporting of OVX and ORX terms was low (1.44%-2.64%) and reporting of OVX and ORX with sex uncommon (0.4%-0.3%). When studies were combined to include both sexes and OVX (representing female) and ORX terms (representing male), a bias toward reporting of female mice was evident. However, when the terms OVX and ORX were removed, a bias toward the use of male mice was identified. Thus, studies focusing on sex hormones are biased toward female reporting with all other studies biased in reporting of male mice. We now call upon journal editors to introduce consistent guidance for transparent and accessible reporting of murine sex in skeletal research to better monitor preclinical sex bias, to diversify development of treatments for bone health, and to enable global skeletal health equity. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Indexed as

Bone and BonesGonadal Steroid HormonesAnimalsBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleMiceOvariectomyGonadal Steroid HormonesAGINGGENETIC ANIMAL MODELSOSTEOPOROSISPRECLINICAL STUDIESSEX STEROIDS

Identifiers

PMID36301601
PMCPMC10099537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.