ArticleDoklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections2022
Endosperm Development Traits in a Comparative Analysis of Endospermogenesis and Embryogenesis in Angiosperms.
Article in Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From the MMC Specification to Endosperm Cellularization in Arabidopsis: A Developmental-Handover Framework for Seed Initiation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sugar import mediated by sugar transporters and cell wall invertases for seed development inHorticulture research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The article discusses the fertilization process, the nucleus position in the primary cell, specifics of early endosperm development, and the principles of its classification. A new, refined classification was proposed for endosperm development modes to include three hierarchic levels: types, subtypes, and variations. Two types were distinguished by the morphogenetic potentials of the micropylar and chalazal primary cells: cellular (karyokinesis is completed with cytokinesis in both cells) and helobial (only karyokinesis takes place in both cells, and the chalazal cell sometimes remains mononucleate). The nuclear endosperm was considered as a subtype of the helobial type. Subtypes were isolated by the extent to which the micropylar and chalazal cells are involved in forming the endosperm. Variations were recognized within the subtypes by the position of walls during the tetrad or triad formation in the cellular endosperm or the number of nuclei in the chalazal cell in the helobial endosperm. The types of embryogenesis are possible to compare with subtypes or even variations of the cellular endosperm type in a comparative analysis of flowering plants, and both of the traits (the contribution of micropylar and chalazal cell derivatives to the endosperm formation and the pattern of primary cell division with the form of the tetrad) should be considered together. Two subtypes and two variations are possible to consider for the helobial endosperm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36301432What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.