ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2022
Computational Analysis of Cardiac Contractile Function.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Light-Sheet Imaging to Reveal Cardiac Structure in Rodent Hearts.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024Article
- 4D Light-sheet Imaging of Zebrafish Cardiac Contraction.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024Article
- 4D Light-sheet imaging and interactive analysis of cardiac contractility in zebrafish larvae.APL bioengineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewHeart failure results in the high incidence and mortality all over the world. Mechanical properties of myocardium are critical determinants of cardiac function, with regional variations in myocardial contractility demonstrated within infarcted ventricles. Quantitative assessment of cardiac contractile function is therefore critical to identify myocardial infarction for the early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. RECENT
findingsCurrent advancement of cardiac functional assessments is in pace with the development of imaging techniques. The methods tailored to advanced imaging have been widely used in cardiac magnetic resonance, echocardiography, and optical microscopy. In this review, we introduce fundamental concepts and applications of representative methods for each imaging modality used in both fundamental research and clinical investigations. All these methods have been designed or developed to quantify time-dependent 2-dimensional (2D) or 3D cardiac mechanics, holding great potential to unravel global or regional myocardial deformation and contractile function from end-systole to end-diastole. Computational methods to assess cardiac contractile function provide a quantitative insight into the analysis of myocardial mechanics during cardiac development, injury, and remodeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.