Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301346›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Hysterectomy in benign conditions: a 20-year single-center retrospective on the development of surgical techniques.

Paul Buderath, Rainer Kimmig, Lisa Dominowski, Pawel Mach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Complex caesarean delivery.Case reports in women's health · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul BuderathWest German Cancer Center, Department for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. paul.buderath@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0941-5635
Rainer KimmigWest German Cancer Center, Department for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Lisa DominowskiWest German Cancer Center, Department for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Pawel MachWest German Cancer Center, Department for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMinimally invasive (MI) surgery has long been established as a standard for hysterectomy in benign conditions. Robotic surgery is generally seen as equivalent to conventional laparoscopy in terms of patient outcome. However, robotics might facilitate an MI approach even in complex patients, rendering laparotomy unnecessary for almost all patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe identified 1939 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions between 2002 and 2020 at the University Hospital of Essen. Peri- and postoperative data as well as patient characteristics were collected retrospectively.

resultsRobotic surgery, implemented at our institution in 2010, was the most common approach (n = 771; 39.8%). 60.2% of all hysterectomies (1168/1938) were performed using MI techniques. However, there was a significant shift in the methods used for hysterectomy over time. While in 2002 51.4% of all hysterectomies were performed via an open abdominal approach, this percentage dropped to 1.4% in the year 2020. Accordingly, the use of MI approaches increased from 18.9% in 2002 to 98.6% in 2020. The introduction of robotic surgery in 2010 marked a significant shift towards more MI procedures. MI surgery resulted in shorter hospital stay and less postoperative complications compared to laparotomy. On a special note, our cohort includes the largest uterus myomatous uterus in the scientific literature with a specimen weight of 54.8 kg.

conclusionOur data support the hypothesis that the implementation of robotic surgery leads to an improved capability to perform MI surgery and avoid laparotomy in almost all patients. The known benefits of MI surgery could be confirmed.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHysterectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesBenign conditionsHysterectomyRobotic surgerySurgical gynecologyUterine fibroids

Identifiers

PMID36301346
PMCPMC9984331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.