Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301344›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2023

Sun protective behaviors in sun-sensitive individuals: a cross-sectional study examining for ethnic and racial differences.

Nicole L Bolick, Linglin Huang, Nicole Trepanowski, Rebecca I Hartman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rural-Urban Differences in Sun Exposure and Protection Behaviors in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole L Bolick *Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Linglin Huang *Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicole TrepanowskiBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Rebecca I HartmanDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. rhartman@bwh.harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rates of non-melanoma skin cancer continue to rise in the United States. We investigated if differences exist in skin cancer preventive behaviors among sun-sensitive non-Hispanic whites and other racial and ethnic groups. The National Health Information Survey was used to perform the cross-sectional study. Outcomes of interest included multiple sun-protective methods. Individuals were determined to be sun-sensitive if Fitzpatrick skin phototype (SPT) I/II. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the associations between the use of sun-protective practices and race and ethnicity, SPT, and survey year. The study included 67,471 individuals. Adjusted prevalences of skin cancer preventive behaviors revealed that across all SPTs, non-Hispanic whites were more likely to use sunscreen, undergo physician-administered FBSE, and have multiple sunburns or tan indoors in the past year compared to corresponding SPT other racial and ethnic groups. In contrast, other racial and ethnic groups with any SPT were more likely to practice sun avoidance than corresponding SPT non-Hispanic whites. Additionally, other racial and ethnic groups with SPT III+ were more likely to wear sun-protective clothing than non-Hispanic white individuals with similar SPTs. For all SPT and racial and ethnic groups, there were significant increases in sunscreen use and decreases in past-year indoor tanning. Full body skin examination prevalence, regardless of sun sensitivity, increased for all non-Hispanic whites, but remained unchanged for sun-sensitive other racial and ethnic groups. Adjusted prevalence of multiple sunburns and use of protective clothing remained unchanged for all racial and ethnic groups across all SPT categories. There are differences in sun-protective behaviors among sun-sensitive individuals by race and ethnicity with the magnitude of some of these differences increasing. Future research and public health campaigns are needed on photosensitive individuals and the relationship between skin protective behaviors and race/ethnicity. When discussing sun protection, care providers should not only consider the influence of sun-sensitivity, but also race and ethnicity, and its impact on sun prevention behaviors.

Indexed as

Skin NeoplasmsSunburnCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRace FactorsSunscreening AgentsUnited StatesSunscreening AgentsPreventionRaceSkin phototypeSPTSun protectionSun-sensitive

Identifiers

PMID36301344
OpenAlexW4307432911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.