Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301266›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2023

Damage Mechanics of Biological Tissues in Relation to Viscoelasticity.

Gerard A Ateshian, Kimberly R Kroupa, Courtney A Petersen, Brandon K Zimmerman, Steve A Maas, Jeffrey A Weiss

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gerard A AteshianDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Kimberly R KroupaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Courtney A PetersenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Brandon K ZimmermanComputational Geosciences Group, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550.
Steve A MaasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Jeffrey A WeissDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Columbia University · USUniversity of Utah · USLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · US

Funding

Finite Elements For Biomechanics And BiophysicsR01GM083925 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GERARD A. ATESHIAN, JEFFREY A. WEISS · 2008 to 2026
$7.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the theoretical foundations for the damage mechanics of biological tissues in relation to viscoelasticity. Its primary goal is to provide a mechanistic understanding of well-known experimental observations in biomechanics, which show that the ultimate tensile strength of viscoelastic biological tissues typically increases with increasing strain rate. The basic premise of this framework is that tissue damage occurs when strong bonds, such as covalent bonds in the solid matrix of a biological tissue, break in response to loading. This type of failure is described as elastic damage, under the idealizing assumption that strong bonds behave elastically. Viscoelasticity arises from three types of dissipative mechanisms: (1) Friction between molecules of the same species, which is represented by the tissue viscosity. (2) Friction between fluid and solid constituents of a porous medium, which is represented by the tissue hydraulic permeability. (3) Dissipative reactions arising from weak bonds breaking in response to loading, and reforming in a stress-free state, such as hydrogen bonds and other weak electrostatic bonds. When a viscoelastic tissue is subjected to loading, some of that load may be temporarily supported by those frictional and weak bond forces, reducing the amount of load supported by elastic strong bonds and thus, the extent of elastic damage sustained by those bonds. This protective effect depends on the characteristic time response of viscoelastic mechanisms in relation to the loading history. This study formalizes these concepts by presenting general equations that can model the damage mechanics of viscoelastic tissues.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBiomechanical PhenomenaElasticityPorosityStress, MechanicalTensile StrengthViscosity

Identifiers

PMID36301266
PMCPMC9791672
OpenAlexW4307425042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.