Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301260›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic hypothermia and temperature management2022

Targeted Temperature Management Using Esophageal Cooling.

Cedar Morrow Anderson, Christopher Joseph, Rick Fisher, Donald Berry, J Brad Diestelhorst, Christine Kulstad, Marvin Wayne

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. The Pathology of the Brain Eating AmoebaIndian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cedar Morrow AndersonIntensive Care Unit, PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center, Bellingham, Washington, USA.
Christopher JosephDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Rick FisherIntensive Care Unit, PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center, Bellingham, Washington, USA.
Donald BerryIntensive Care Unit, PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center, Bellingham, Washington, USA.
J Brad DiestelhorstIntensive Care Unit, PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center, Bellingham, Washington, USA.
Christine KulstadDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Marvin WayneIntensive Care Unit, PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center, Bellingham, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6190-958X
PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although specific temperature targets are debated, targeted temperature management (TTM) is a common treatment for postcardiac arrest patients. However, consistently implementing a TTM protocol is challenging, especially in a community hospital. Often, the protocols described in the literature include labor- and cost-intensive methods that are not feasible or sustainable in many health care settings. Esophageal temperature management (ETM) is a TTM method that can be easily utilized alone or combined with surface methods. We sought to evaluate ETM in a cohort of patients treated with TTM after cardiac arrest. Chart reviews were conducted of all patients treated with ETM after cardiac arrest at our community medical center. Initial patient temperature, time to target, supplemental methods (water blankets, chest wraps, or head wraps), and patient survival were extracted for analysis. A total of 54 patients were treated from August 2016 to November 2018; 30 received ETM only, 22 received supplemental cooling, and 2 had treatment discontinued before reaching target due to recovery. Target temperatures ranged from 32°C to 36°C, depending on provider preference. The median time to target temperature for the entire cohort was 219 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 81-415). For the cohorts without, and with, supplemental cooling modalities, the median time to attain target temperature was 128 minutes (IQR 71-334), and 285 minutes (IQR 204-660), respectively. Survival to intensive care unit discharge was 51.9% for the entire cohort. Survivors exhibited longer times to achieve goal temperature (median 180 minutes in nonsurvivors vs. 255 minutes in survivors). ETM attains target temperature at a rate consistent with current guidelines and with similar performance to alternative modalities. As in other studies, surviving patients required longer times to reach target temperature.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationHeart ArrestHypothermia, InducedOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestBody TemperatureEsophagusHumansTemperatureesophageal coolingtargeted temperature managementtherapeutic hypothermia

Identifiers

PMID36301260
PMCPMC9700367
OpenAlexW4307429825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.