Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36301215›Full record

SynthesisAddiction biology2022

Classic psychedelics and alcohol use disorders: A systematic review of human and animal studies.

Javier Calleja-Conde, Jose Angel Morales-García, Víctor Echeverry-Alzate, Kora Mareen Bühler, Elena Giné, Jose Antonio López-Moreno

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Javier Calleja-CondeCardenal Cisneros Higher Education Center, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0573-3863
Jose Angel Morales-GarcíaDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9008-0056
Víctor Echeverry-AlzateSchool of Life and Nature Sciences, Nebrija University, Madrid, Spain.
Kora Mareen BühlerDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology in Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, Somosaguas Campus, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Elena GinéDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Antonio López-MorenoDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology in Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, Somosaguas Campus, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6668-6568
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESCentre for Higher Education · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classic psychedelics refer to substances such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), psilocybin, ayahuasca, and mescaline, which induce altered states of consciousness by acting mainly on 5-HT

Indexed as

AlcoholismHallucinogensAnimalsHumansLysergic Acid DiethylamideMescalinePsilocybinHallucinogensLysergic Acid DiethylamideMescalinePsilocybinalcoholayahuascaclassic psychedelicsLSDmescalinepsilocybin

Identifiers

PMID36301215
PMCPMC9541961
OpenAlexW4294308393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.