Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36300929›Full record

ArticlemBio2022

Sequential Transmission of Influenza Viruses in Ferrets Does Not Enhance Infectivity and Does Not Predict Transmissibility in Humans.

Troy C Sutton, Elaine W Lamirande, Devanshi R Patel, Katherine E E Johnson, Rita Czako, Elodie Ghedin, Raphael T C Lee, Sebastian Maurer-Stroh, Kanta Subbarao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Ventilation does not affect close-range transmission of influenza virus in a ferret playpen setup.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Troy C SuttonLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7880-4784
Elaine W LamirandeLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Devanshi R PatelDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Katherine E E JohnsonCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York Universitygrid.137628.9, New York, New York, USA.
Rita CzakoLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Elodie GhedinCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York Universitygrid.137628.9, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1515-725X
Raphael T C LeeInfectious Diseases Laboratories (ID Labs), Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore.
Sebastian Maurer-StrohInfectious Diseases Laboratories (ID Labs), Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore.
Kanta SubbaraoLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1713-3056
National Institutes of Health · USAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGNew York University · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Airborne transmission in ferrets is a key component of pandemic risk assessment. However, some emerging avian influenza viruses transmit between ferrets but do not spread in humans. Therefore, we evaluated sequential rounds of airborne transmission as an approach to enhance the predictive accuracy of the ferret model. We reasoned that infection of ferrets via the respiratory route and onward transmission would more closely model transmission in humans. We hypothesized that pandemic and seasonal viruses would transmit efficiently over two rounds of transmission, while emerging avian viruses would fail to transmit in a second round. The 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pdm09) and seasonal H3N2 viruses were compared to avian-origin H7N9 and H3N8 viruses. Depending on the virus strain, transmission efficiency varied from 50 to 100% during the first round of transmission; the efficiency for each virus did not change during the second round, and viral replication kinetics in both rounds of transmission were similar. Both the H1N1pdm09 and H7N9 viruses acquired specific mutations during sequential transmission, while the H3N2 and H3N8 viruses did not; however, a global analysis of host-adaptive mutations revealed that minimal changes were associated with transmission of H1N1 and H3N2 viruses, while a greater number of changes occurred in the avian H3N8 and H7N9 viruses. Thus, influenza viruses that transmit in ferrets maintain their transmission efficiency through serial rounds of transmission. This answers the question of whether ferrets can propagate viruses through more than one round of airborne transmission and emphasizes that transmission in ferrets is necessary but not sufficient to infer transmissibility in humans.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N8 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H7N9 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsAnimalsBirdsFerretsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtypeairborne transmissionferret modelinfluenzapandemic risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID36300929
PMCPMC9765597
OpenAlexW4307431335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.