Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36300825›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2022

Photodynamic versus white-light-guided resection of first-diagnosis non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: PHOTO RCT.

Rakesh Heer, Rebecca Lewis, Anne Duncan, Steven Penegar, Thenmalar Vadiveloo, Emma Clark, Ge Yu, Paramananthan Mariappan, Joanne Cresswell, John McGrath and 21 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Rakesh HeerNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1952-7462
Rebecca LewisClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9222-5263
Anne DuncanCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7644-006X
Steven PenegarClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3768-0236
Thenmalar VadivelooCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5531-6289
Emma ClarkNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0065-1463
Ge YuNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0891-2501
Paramananthan MariappanDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8221-4640
Joanne CresswellDepartment of Urology, South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1699-0339
John McGrathDepartment of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9416-9912
James N'DowAcademic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5340-0081
Ghulam NabiSchool of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9406-5195
Hugh MostafidDepartment of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5095-2929
John KellyUniversity College London Cancer Institute, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7036-1923
Craig RamsayHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4043-7349
Henry LazarowiczDepartment of Urology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0792-2983
Angela AllanDepartment of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7410-5778
Matthew BreckonsNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3057-6767
Karen CampbellCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1215-8991
Louise CampbellCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6440-6486
Andy FeberUniversity College London Cancer Institute, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5282-0498
Alison McDonaldCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0256-2889
John NorrieEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9823-9252
Giovany Orozco-LealNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7473-7318
Stephen RiceNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-0813
Zafer TandogduUniversity College London Cancer Institute, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-3656
Ernest TaylorTyne and Wear, UK.
Laura WilsonNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7919-2230
Luke ValeNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8574-8429
Graeme MacLennanCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-5646
Emma HallClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5999-5020
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBAberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBCumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust · GBNHS Lothian · GBRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital · GBRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAround 7500 people are diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the UK annually. Recurrence following transurethral resection of bladder tumour is common, and the intensive monitoring schedule required after initial treatment has associated costs for patients and the NHS. In photodynamic diagnosis, before transurethral resection of bladder tumour, a photosensitiser that is preferentially absorbed by tumour cells is instilled intravesically. Transurethral resection of bladder tumour is then conducted under blue light, causing the photosensitiser to fluoresce. Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour offers better diagnostic accuracy than standard white-light-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour, potentially reducing the chance of subsequent recurrence.

objectiveThe objective was to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour.

designThis was a multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, parallel-group, non-masked, superiority randomised controlled trial. Allocation was by remote web-based service, using a 1 : 1 ratio and a minimisation algorithm balanced by centre and sex.

settingThe setting was 22 NHS hospitals.

participantsPatients aged ≥ 16 years with a suspected first diagnosis of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, no contraindications to photodynamic diagnosis and written informed consent were eligible.

interventionsPhotodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour and standard white-light cystoscopy transurethral resection of bladder tumour.

main outcome measuresThe primary clinical outcome measure was the time to recurrence from the date of randomisation to the date of pathologically proven first recurrence (or intercurrent bladder cancer death). The primary health economic outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained at 3 years.

resultsWe enrolled 538 participants from 22 UK hospitals between 11 November 2014 and 6 February 2018. Of these, 269 were allocated to photodynamic diagnosis and 269 were allocated to white light. A total of 112 participants were excluded from the analysis because of ineligibility ( LIMITATIONS: Fewer patients than anticipated were correctly diagnosed with intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer before transurethral resection of bladder tumour and the ratio of intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer was higher than expected, reducing the number of observed recurrences and the statistical power.

conclusionsPhotodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour did not reduce recurrences, nor was it likely to be cost-effective compared with white light at 3 years. Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not supported in the management of primary intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. FUTURE WORK: Further work should include the modelling of appropriate surveillance schedules and exploring predictive and prognostic biomarkers.

trial registrationThis trial is registered as ISRCTN84013636.

fundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research ( NIHR ) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkersCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansLightPhotochemotherapyQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalBiomarkersBLADDER CANCERNON-MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER CANCERPHASE III: TRANSURETHRAL RESECTIONPHOTODYNAMIC DETECTIONRANDOMISED TRIALSURGERYTRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMOURURINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS

Identifiers

PMID36300825
PMCPMC9639219
OpenAlexW4307502487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.