Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36300797›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Wide-ranging consequences of priority effects governed by an overarching factor.

Callie R Chappell, Manpreet K Dhami, Mark C Bitter, Lucas Czech, Sur Herrera Paredes, Fatoumata Binta Barrie, Yadira Calderón, Katherine Eritano, Lexi-Ann Golden, Daria Hekmat-Scafe and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Competition for shared resources increases dependence on initial population size during coalescence of gut microbial communities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. mSystems · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Callie R ChappellDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4611-0021
Manpreet K DhamiDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Mark C BitterDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7607-2375
Lucas CzechDepartment of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-9644
Sur Herrera ParedesDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Fatoumata Binta BarrieDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Yadira CalderónDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Katherine EritanoDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Lexi-Ann GoldenDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Daria Hekmat-ScafeDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Veronica HsuDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Goleta, United States.
Clara KieschnickDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Shyamala MalladiDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Nicole RushDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Tadashi FukamiDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5654-4785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Priority effects, where arrival order and initial relative abundance modulate local species interactions, can exert taxonomic, functional, and evolutionary influences on ecological communities by driving them to alternative states. It remains unclear if these wide-ranging consequences of priority effects can be explained systematically by a common underlying factor. Here, we identify such a factor in an empirical system. In a series of field and laboratory studies, we focus on how pH affects nectar-colonizing microbes and their interactions with plants and pollinators. In a field survey, we found that nectar microbial communities in a hummingbird-pollinated shrub,

Indexed as

Plant NectarPollinationAnimalsBacteriaBirdsFlowersPlantsYeastsPlant Nectaracinetobacter nectariscalypte annacommunity assemblydiplacus aurantiacuseco-evolutionary dynamicsecologyevolutionary biologymetacommunitymetschnikowia reukaufiipollinationpriority effectrapid evolution

Identifiers

PMID36300797
PMCPMC9671501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.