Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36300353›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2022

Global drought trends and future projections.

Sergio M Vicente-Serrano, Dhais Peña-Angulo, Santiago Beguería, Fernando Domínguez-Castro, Miquel Tomás-Burguera, Iván Noguera, Luis Gimeno-Sotelo, Ahmed El Kenawy

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
29.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 294 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sergio M Vicente-SerranoInstituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPE-CSIC), Zaragoza 50059, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2892-518X
Dhais Peña-AnguloHydroSciences Montpellier, University Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, CEDEX, Montpellier 34090, France.
Santiago BegueríaEstación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EEAD-CSIC), Zaragoza 50059, Spain.
Fernando Domínguez-CastroAragonese Agency for Research and Development Researcher (ARAID), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Miquel Tomás-BurgueraCentre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse 31057, France.
Iván NogueraInstituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPE-CSIC), Zaragoza 50059, Spain.
Luis Gimeno-SoteloCentro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, Environmental Physics Laboratory (EPhysLab), Ourense, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9305-2325
Ahmed El KenawyDepartment of Geography, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMansoura University · EGUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversidade de Vigo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought is one of the most difficult natural hazards to quantify and is divided into categories (meteorological, agricultural, ecological and hydrological), which makes assessing recent changes and future scenarios extremely difficult. This opinion piece includes a review of the recent scientific literature on the topic and analyses trends in meteorological droughts by using long-term precipitation records and different drought metrics to evaluate the role of global warming processes in trends of agricultural, hydrological and ecological drought severity over the last four decades, during which a sharp increase in atmospheric evaporative demand (AED) has been recorded. Meteorological droughts do not show any substantial changes at the global scale in at least the last 120 years, but an increase in the severity of agricultural and ecological droughts seems to emerge as a consequence of the increase in the severity of AED. Lastly, this study evaluates drought projections from earth system models and focuses on the most important aspects that need to be considered when evaluating drought processes in a changing climate, such as the use of different metrics and the uncertainty of modelling approaches. This article is part of the Royal Society Science+ meeting issue 'Drought risk in the Anthropocene'.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeDroughtsClimateHydrologyUncertaintyatmospheric evaporative demandfuture scenariosprecipitation

Identifiers

PMID36300353
PMCPMC9588423
OpenAlexW4307503147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.