Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36300208›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2022

Peer support between healthcare workers in hospital and out-of-hospital settings: a scoping review.

Roberta Carbone, Silvia Ferrari, Stefano Callegarin, Francesca Casotti, Laura Turina, Giovanna Artioli, Antonio Bonacaro

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. FPHC Wellbeing Charter: The 'Whys' and 'Hows' of the Charter.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberta Carbonea:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:12:"psychologist";}. roberta.carbone@gmail.com.
Silvia FerrariAUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy. silviettamn@gmail.com.
Stefano CallegarinMaster In Critical Area Nursing, University of Parma, Italy. callegarin.stefano@gmail.com.
Francesca CasottiMaster In Critical Area Nursing, University of Parma, Italy. francesca.casotti94@gmail.com.
Laura TurinaMaster In Critical Area Nursing, University of Parma, Italy. lauraturina1993@gmail.com.
Giovanna ArtioliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Italy. giovanna.artioli@unipr.it.
Antonio BonacaroSchool of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Suffolk, United Kingdom. A.Bonacaro@UOS.AC.UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe healthcare workers, mostly in emergency departments, are exposed to emotionally strong situations that can lead to psychological trauma. Often those who experience the "second victim" phenomenon find comfort in dealing with Peers that can help to understand emotions and normalize lived experiences. A scoping review was conducted to clarify the key concepts available in the literature and understand Peer Support characteristics and methods of implementation.  Methods. Scoping review J.B.I. approach was used. The reviewers analyzed the last twenty-one years of literature and extracted data from relevant studies.  Results. The research revealed 49 articles that discuss Peer Support in the healthcare system. Often articles involve healthcare workers without work area and role distinctions. 56% of the articles have been published in the last two years and the Anglo-Saxon countries are the main geographical area of ​​origin (82%). Peer support emerges as a preclinical psychological support for people involved in tiring situations. It's based on mutual respect and on voluntary and not prejudicial help. Peers are trained to guide the support relationship and identify the signs of possible pathologies. Peer Support can be proposed as one to one/group peer support, or through online platforms.  Conclusion. It can be said that Peer Support programs had an important development in the years of the Covid 19 pandemic. Many of the studies affirm that the personnel involved have benefited from the programs available. It is necessary to carry out further research to determine the pre and post intervention benefits.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansPeer Group

Identifiers

PMID36300208
PMCPMC9686152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.