Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36300160›Full record

ArticleGMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW2022

Socio-demographic aspects and treatment-related factors on oral cancer patients' participation in rehabilitation.

Philippe Korn, Simon Spalthoff, Joachim Hammersen, Gertrud Krüskemper, Frank Tavassol, Jan Winterboer, Fritjof Lentge, Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Philipp Jehn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Philippe KornDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Simon SpalthoffDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Joachim HammersenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head, Neck & Plastic Facial Surgery, Klinikum Bad Hersfeld, Germany.
Gertrud KrüskemperDepartment of Medical Psychology, Ruhr University of Bochum, Germany.
Frank TavassolDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jan WinterboerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Fritjof LentgeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Nils-Claudius GellrichDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Philipp JehnDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DERhön-Klinikum · DERuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: After resection of an oral carcinoma, patients are faced with physical, psychological, and socioeconomic challenges. Rehabilitation plays an essential role in patients' reintegration into their social and professional environment. This study evaluated whether socioeconomic aspects affect oral cancer patients' participation in rehabilitation treatment. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted with 1,532 patients following surgical treatment of oral cancer during an international multicenter rehabilitation study of the German-Swiss-Austrian Cooperative Working Group on Maxillofacial Tumors using a questionnaire comprising disease-related and psychosocial items postoperatively and at least 6 months after surgery. Results: Only 35.4% of patients participated in rehabilitation. Age (p<0.001), sex (p<0.001), and marital status (p<0.05) significantly influenced participation in rehabilitation. Postoperative impairment (p<0.05) as well as quality of life (p<0.01) were significantly worse in patients who participated in rehabilitation. Nevertheless, this group of patients returned to work significantly more often, although later, than those who did not participate in rehabilitation (p<0.05). Conclusions: The findings show social inequalities and suggest a general undersupply of rehabilitative follow-up treatment in patients with oral cancer. More patients, especially older people and women should be referred to rehabilitation.

Indexed as

oncologyoral cancerquality of liferehabilitationsocio-demographic aspectssurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID36300160
PMCPMC9577562
OpenAlexW4307502001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.