Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36300150›Full record

ArticleTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2022

Ascitic calprotectin and lactoferrin for detection of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kishan P Patel, Parker M Korbitz, John P Gallagher, Cynthia Schmidt, Thammasin Ingviya, Wuttiporn Manatsathit

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kishan P PatelDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Parker M KorbitzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
John P GallagherDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Cynthia SchmidtMcGoogan Library of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Thammasin IngviyaDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Wuttiporn ManatsathitDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USPrince of Songkla University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common bacterial infection in cirrhotic patients associated with a high mortality rate. Prompt diagnosis and early antibiotic administration are crucial in minimizing adverse outcomes. Although detection of ≥250 polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) in ascitic fluid is the current gold standard to diagnose SBP, consideration for rapid detection with biomarkers is warranted. Methods: A literature search for studies evaluating ascitic calprotectin and lactoferrin for detection of SBP was performed using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, and Clinical Trial Registries. Summary sensitivity, specificity, log diagnostic odds ratio (LDOR), and area under the summary receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: In total, 12 and 13 studies evaluated ascitic calprotectin and lactoferrin, respectively, for detection of SBP. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and LDOR for calprotectin were 0.942 (95% CI, 0.916, 0.967), 0.860 (95% CI, 0.799, 0.935), and 4.250 (95% CI, 3.504, 4.990), respectively. AUC for calprotectin was 0.91. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and LDOR for lactoferrin were 0.954 (95% CI, 0.930, 0.979), 0.890 (95% CI, 0.836, 0.945), and 4.630 (95% CI, 3.800, 5.452), respectively. AUC for lactoferrin was 0.958. Conclusions: The overall performance of ascitic calprotectin and lactoferrin was substantial, potentially serving as a screening tool or an alternative to manual cell count. However, a variety of manufacturers, cut-off values, and significant heterogeneity between studies should be noted. Point-of-care testing for calprotectin and lactoferrin may resolve disadvantages associated with the current methods. Future studies on this topic are, therefore, needed.

Indexed as

ascitescalprotectincirrhosisLactoferrinspontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP)

Identifiers

PMID36300150
PMCPMC9468990
OpenAlexW3163032128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.